Abstract:Based on the relevant law enforcement practice of economic courts, the article studies the problem of choice of proper and effective remedy of a minority shareholder in the procedure of compulsory shares repurchase. It is emphasized that the resolution of this problem shall be based on: 1) the understanding of the mandatory nature of the alienation of shares by a minority shareholder (economically weaker subject), stipulated in Article 65-2 of the Law of Ukraine “On joint-stock companies”, as an atypical contract construction for modern civil and economic legislation; 2) the protection of rights of a minority shareholder in the mandatory shares repurchase should be considered not only in the context of protection of their title, but also in a more broader context — as protection of their subjective corporate right, since the legal consequence of such a sale is not only the termination of their title in a strict sense, but also the termination of their corporate right in the subjective sense as the right of an individual to be a shareholder of a company (legal person). Mandatory sale by a minority shareholder of all shares belonging to them leads not only to the termination of their title in a strict sense, but also to the termination of their corporate right in the subjective sense as the right of an individual to be a shareholder of a company (legal person). Therefore, a minority shareholder in the relations of squeeze-out is entitled not only to receiving some “purchase” price for the mandatory (in essence, compulsory) alienated shares, but also to a fair compensation of loss of their corporate right, which includes proprietary, as well as non-proprietary (organizational) rights, and thus — also the loss of legal possibility to satisfy their investment interest by way of shareholding in a particular joint-stock company. A minority shareholder may seek in court the recognition of not only the right to compensation as such, but the right to compensation at the highest (fair, in terminology of Directive 2004/25/EU) price of share in the specific amount determined by the court. It is argued that the recognition of the claimant’s right to receive fair compensation for shares sold under compulsion is a proper and effective remedy of rights and legitimate interests of a minority shareholder. The issuer of shares shall be the defendant in the lawsuit for recognition of right to receive compensation by a minority shareholder for shares alienated under mandatory sale in accordance with Article 65-2 of the Law of Ukraine “On joint-stock companies”.

Shareholders Lawsuit: Fraud on Minority Law Enforcement to Invent Corrective Justice During the Covid-19

Juridical Analysis of Blocking Sabh Access In The RI Ministry of Minority Shareholders As a Form of Legal Protection of Minority Shareholders

Expropriation of Minority Shareholders in Politically Connected Firms

Minority Shareholders’ Rights, Powers and Duties: The Market for Corporate Influence

Legal Reformulation of Derivative Action Regulations for Protection of Minority Shareholders in Indonesia: Comparative Study of Indonesia and Australia

Reforming private securities litigation in China: does private enforcement by minority shareholders matter to corporate fraud?

The effect of shareholder litigation rights on female board representation: A quasi-natural experiment

Enhancing virtual governance: comparative lessons from COVID-19 company laws

Do the Minority Shareholders of Russian Corporations Need More Protection?

ON THE REMEDIES OF THE JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF A MINORITY SHAREHOLDER IN THE PROCEDURE OF COMPULSORY SHARES REPURCHASE

Social Capital,Law Protection of Minority Investors and IPO Underpricing

An institutional analysis of UK ostensible minority shareholder protection mechanisms

The Role of Cumulative Voting in Protecting Minority Shareholders in Listed Companies

Protection of minority shareholders after the New Company Law: 26 case studies

Test on the law protection of minority investors in China: Perspective of misrepresentation in securities market

Analysis Of Tax Disputes On Loans From Shareholders: A Case Study On Tax Court Rulings For The Period 2018-2022

Does shareholder litigation risk promote or hinder corporate social responsibility? A quasi‐natural experiment

Minority shareholder activism and its ex-ante monitoring role in corporate M&A decisions: Evidence from China

The Governance Role of Minority State Ownership in Non‐state‐owned Enterprises: Evidence from Corporate Fraud in China

Law and Regulation as Safeguards for Investors Against Crime in Capital Market Sector

Minority shareholders' activism and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China