Abstract:The purpose of this article is to study the issue of key features of the so-called cultural words (realia) in sacred texts (the Bible is taken as an example) as well as a distinctive nature of their cross-language transfer. This problem is essential not only for the Bible translation as such but it also enables to clarify some aspects related to the representation of the vocabulary with cultural identity in the target language that is explained by the very nature of the Old and New Testaments containing a wide variety of the realia that refer directly to a religious cult and to the everyday life of Palestinian people and their neighborhood in the Bible times. The material for the present research includes versions of the Holy Writ created in different periods in a number of languages (Latin, Church Slavonic, Russian and English). While analyzing, the classical translations labelled often as “national” ones have been used (the King James Bible, Synodal Translation), as well and the versions created in the 20th and 21st centuries. The main approach applied herein is the identifying of the corresponding units in the said Bible texts, the ascertainment of the possibility of their ambivalent interpretation, the correlation within the considered versions of translation, the determination of translation strategies used for representing the realia and their comparative analysis. When considering the options presented, special attention has been paid to extra-linguistic factors, since they often play a decisive role in solving the said task. The key results of the made survey can be formulated as follows: 1) since translations could have been made from different versions of the source text, there are cases when certain realia are available in some translations but are missing in others; 2) the use of transcription / transliteration of the realia in Russian versions of the Old Testament in some cases is determined by their representation in the Greek and Church Slavonic texts of the Bible and therefore in both the Synodal and the new translations they can be presented in a form different from that available in European languages; 3) the representation of the Greek word diopetês ( fallen from heaven ) as the proper name Diopet in the Synodal Translation is usually qualified as an elementary mistake, but it could have been also provoked by an intention to follow Greek and Church Slavonic traditions; 4) the existence of the so-called ‘undefined realia’ in the source text, an exact meaning of which is not known, causes their various interpretations in the target language; 5) during the analysis of the units of the target language used in the translation of the Holy Writ, the diachronic aspect must be taken into account considering, on the one hand, the possibility of losing or changing the meaning in the course of linguistic evolution, and on the other hand, avoiding vesting the reality with the meaning that it could not have; 6) a number of translations made in recent decades are characterized by a pronounced pragmatic orientation, in some cases causing a significant neutralization of the national-cultural specificity or its adaptation to the corresponding cultural environment, the degree of admissibility of which in some cases is controversial. The above items enable to clarify a number of aspects related to the methods of translating the realia and the importance of such aspects for attaining the translation adequacy.

Review of: Aramaic Studies. Vol. 16. Leiden: Brill, 2018. 299 p. ISSN 1477-8351

History of Foreign and Domestic Post-Soviet Research in the Field of Slavic Mythology and Folk Beliefs

Book Reviews for Volume 11.2 – ADDENDUM

Sources of Slavic Pre-Christian Religion / ed. J. A. Alvarez-Pedroza. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2021. 548 p. ISBN 978-90-04-44061-6

Religious Lexis in Russian Ecclesiastical and Religious Auto-documentary texts: Typology and Stylistic functions

Book Review of 'Evolutionary and Interpretive Archaeologies' Edited by Ethan E. Cochrane and Andrew Gardner

Study of the Ways and Nature of the Interaction of Russian Literature and Journalism in a Crisis Era

Journal “Legal Linguistics”: abstract review

The Bible in the religious and philosophical works of N. S. Arseniev: Mystical experience

Reviewers of “The Edinburgh Review” in the First Third of the 19th Century: Touches to a Collective Portrait

Reviewer Acknowledgements for English Linguistics Research, Vol. 12, No. 1

History and typology of the spiritual verse of Old Believers Book review: Murashova N. S. Old Believers spiritual verse in the context of the historical evolution of non-ecclesiastical spiritual singing. Novosibirsk, NSPU Publ., 2019, 371 p.

The Apocalypse in Codex Alexandrinus: Exegetical Reasoning and Singular Readings in New Testament Greek Manuscripts

“In the Unity and Diversity of Artistic Traditions” (Book Review: Sozina, E.K. (Ed.) (2020) Istoriya Literatury Urala. XIX Vek: V 2 Kn. [A History of Ural Literature. 19th Century: In 2 Books]. Moscow: LRC)

Russian Diachronic Linguistics and Philology. Three Decades of Research in Italy (years 1991-2021)

V INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “ARCHIVAL BRANCH IN ORIENTAL STUDIES” (INSTITUTE OF ORIENTAL STUDIES OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, MOSCOW, NOVEMBER 17–19, 2021)

Cultural Words in Sacral Text and their Translation: Linguistic and Extra-Linguistic Factors

Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Galen edited by Petros Bouras-Vallianatos and Barbara Zipser

From Dialogue to Polylogue (review of the book: Comparative Philosophy: From Comparative to Intercultural Philosophy / co-edited by M.T. Stepanyants. Moscow: Nauka; Vost. lit., 2022. 399 p.)

Book review: Tatsumi, Y. & Tsurumi, T. (eds) (2020) Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A history of print media from Enlightenment to Revolution. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 280 р.

COMPREHENSION OF THE “RELIGIOUS REVOLUTION” OF THE 1960–1980s IN THE WORKS OF ALAN WATTS AND ROBERT BELLAH