Abstract:Variation in the local thermal history during the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) process in Additive Manufacturing (AM) can cause micropore defects, which add to the uncertainty of the mechanical properties (e.g., fatigue life, tensile strength) of the built materials. In-situ sensing has been proposed for monitoring the AM process to minimize defects, but successful minimization requires establishing a quantitative relationship between the sensing data and the porosity, which is particularly challenging with a large number of variables (e.g., laser speed, power, scan path, powder property). Physics-based modeling can simulate such an in-situ sensing-porosity relationship, but it is computationally costly. In this work, we develop Machine Learning (ML) models that can use in-situ thermographic data to predict the micropore of LPBF stainless steel materials. This work considers two identified key features from the thermal histories: the time above the apparent melting threshold (τ) and the maximum radiance (Tmax). These features are computed, stored for each voxel in the built material, and then used as inputs. The binary state of each voxel, either defective or normal, is the output. Different ML models are trained and tested for the binary classification task. In addition to using the thermal features of each voxel to predict its own state, the thermal features of neighboring voxels are also included as inputs. This is shown to improve the prediction accuracy, which is consistent with thermal transport physics around each voxel contributing to its final state. Among the models trained, the F1 scores on test sets reach above 0.96 for Random Forests. Feature importance analysis based on the ML models shows that Tmax is more important to the voxel state than τ. The analysis also finds that the thermal history of the voxels above the present voxel is more influential than those beneath it. Our study significantly extends the capability of using in-situ thermographic data to predict porosity in LPBF materials. Since ML models are fast, they may play integral roles in the optimization and control of such AM technologies.

Deriving Data-Driven Models That Relate Deterministic Surface Topography Parameters of As-Built Inconel 718 Surfaces to Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Parameters

Characterizing the as-built surface topography of Inconel 718 specimens as a function of laser powder bed fusion process parameters

Statistical parameterized physics-based machine learning digital shadow models for laser powder bed fusion process

A universal predictor-based machine learning model for optimal process maps in laser powder bed fusion process

A new data-driven framework for prediction of molten pool evolution and lack of fusion defects in multi-track multi-layer laser powder bed fusion processes

Laser Powder Bed Fusion Parameter Selection via Machine-Learning-Augmented Process Modeling

Predicting melt track geometry and part density in laser powder bed fusion of metals using machine learning

A Novel Framework of Developing a Predictive Model for Powder Bed Fusion Process

Integrating Phase Field Modeling and Machine Learning to Develop Process-Microstructure Relationships in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of IN718

A generalized machine learning framework for data-driven prediction of relative density in laser powder bed fusion parts

Predicting defects in laser powder bed fusion using in-situ thermal imaging data and machine learning

Traditional machine learning and deep learning for predicting melt-pool cross-sectional morphology of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing with thermographic monitoring

Predictions of in-situ melt pool geometric signatures via machine learning techniques for laser metal deposition

Focus Variation Measurement and Prediction of Surface Texture Parameters Using Machine Learning in Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Downskin Surface Roughness Prediction with Machine Learning for As-Built CM247LC Fabricated Via Powder Bed Fusion with a Laser Beam

Characterisation and prediction of mechanical properties in laser powder bed fusion-printed parts: a comparative analysis using machine learning

An Image-Based Transfer Learning Approach for Using In Situ Processing Data to Predict Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Mechanical Properties

Linking Process Parameters with Lack-of-Fusion Porosity for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Metal Additive Manufacturing

A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Melt-Pool Dynamics of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy in the Laser Powder-Bed Fusion Process

Inconel-718 processing windows by directed energy deposition: a framework combining computational fluid dynamics and machine learning models with experimental validation