Enhancing Sensitivity of Immunomagnetic Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers with Magnetic Nanoparticles and Anti‐Biofouling Coating

Yuancheng Li,Hui Mao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.066342
2022-12-01
Abstract:Immunomagnetic capturing/detection of biomarkers, including immunoprecipitation‐mass‐spectrometry (IP‐MS) and single molecule array (Simoa®), is a key technology in biofluidic‐based in vitro diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, proteins and other biomolecules in samples can non‐specifically absorb on the surface of biomarker‐targeting ligand functionalized capturing agents, such as commercial magnetic beads (Dynabeads®). Such “biofouling” effect leads to the formation of a “protein corona” that not only attenuates the detection specificity, sensitivity and reproducibility by blocking the binding of targeted biomarkers, but also creates strong “contaminating” background signals. This report introduces a polyethylene glycol‐block‐allyl glycidyl ether (PEG‐b‐AGE) polymer coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle (IONP) rendering anti‐biofouling capability to improve the sensitivity of blood‐sample‐based AD biomarker detection. Non‐specifically adsorbed proteins on Dynabeads® and anti‐biofouling IONP after incubating with human serum were quantified to evaluate biofouling effect. Dynabeads® and IONP were conjugated with antibodies, and compared for the detection of fluorescent dye FITC‐labeled AD biomarkers spiked in human serum (10 to 2000 pg/mL), including Aβ40, Aβ42, and phosphorylated tau (p‐tau181), which were quantified by fluorescence. To compare the detection in the settings of current platforms, spiked Aβ40 and Aβ42 in human serum were measured by IP‐MS using antibody‐conjugated Dynabeads® and IONP as the capturing agents. Antibodies in assay kits of Simoa® were used to conjugated with Dynabeads® and IONP to compare the detection of five AD biomarkers spiked in human serum in the Simoa® setting. Additionally, plasma samples from 21 AD patients were tested for Aβ40 and Aβ42 measurement using antibody‐conjugated IONP and Dynabeads® by IP‐MS. Anti‐biofouling IONP demonstrated a ∼20‐fold reduction in serum protein adsorption, comparing to Dynabeads®. Dynabeads® and IONP demonstrated comparable detection sensitivity (captured/spiked, %) when spiked AD biomarkers at the concentration of ∼200‐2000 pg/mL. However, in samples with spiked AD biomarkers at ∼10‐100 pg/mL, Dynabeads® showed a decreased sensitivity up to 29% comparing to IONP. When Aβ40 and Aβ42 in patient plasma samples were immunoprecipitated by IONP or Dynabeads and analyzed by mass‐spectrometry, IONP showed 1.8‐ to 23.5‐folds greater signal‐to‐noise ratio (peak intensity/baseline) than Dynabeads®. Anti‐biofouling IONP demonstrated improved sensitivity in blood‐based AD biomarker detections over Dynabeads®.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?