Feasibility of Single-Breath-Hold Compressed Sensing Real-Time Cine Imaging for Assessment of Ventricular Function and Left Ventricular Strain in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Qiao Deng,Lu Tang,Xi Wu,Tao Wu,Shuai He,Lei Li,Wei Cheng,Yi-Ke Diao,Kai-Yue Diao,Wen-Jun Yue,Yu-Cheng Chen,Jia-Yu Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12182/20220560506
2022-01-01
Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of single-breath-hold compressed sensing real-time cine imaging (CS-cine) in the assessment of ventricular function and left ventricular (LV) strain. MethodsA total of 70 subjects were enrolled prospectively, and all subjects underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cardiac MRI) using both the standard steady-state free procession cine (sta-cine) acquisition and a prototype CS-cine sequence. For both CS-cine and sta-cine imaging, continuous short-axis cine images were acquired from the base to the apex to cover the entire left ventricle, and long-axis cine images including two-, three-, and four-chamber views were also acquired. The scanning range, number of slices, slice thickness and intervals were kept identical for the two cine images of the same participant. Subjective evaluation of the image quality was performed on all cine images. For both sequences, the conventional function parameters of the left and the right ventricles and LV strain values were assessed with post-processing software analysis. The cine image quality, conventional ventricular function parameters, and LV strain values were compared between the two cine groups and the differences were examined. Inter- and intraobserver agreements for CS-cine images were measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess reproducibility between the two cine methods. ResultsThe median scanning time of CS-cine was 21 s versus 272 s for sta-cine (P<0.001). The median image quality scores of two groups were significantly different, 4 points for sta-cine and 2 points for CS-cine (P<0.001). Bi-ventricular end-diastolic volumes (EDV), stroke volume (SV) and ejection fraction (EF) were significantly smaller in CS-cine (P<0.001). Nevertheless, no significant differences between the two groups in bi-ventricular ESV or LV mass were observed (P>0.05). LV strain parameters, including the peak radial strain, peak circumferential strain and peak longitudinal strain derived from LV mid-ventricular slice, were significantly different in the two sequences (P<0.001). Moreover, CS-cine-derived functional parameters and strain measurements have a good correlation with those of sta-cine (for RV function parameters, and left ventricular PLS, PCS values, more than 95% points fell within the limits of agreement [LoA]; meanwhile, more than 91% points fell within the LoA for other parameters) and inter- and intraobserver agreements were strong (ICC=0.88 to 0.99) for CS-cine.ConclusionCS-cine can well realize the rapid acquisition of cine images for quantitative analysis of cardiac function, and the conventional ventricular function parameters and LV globalized strain values obtained from CS-cine imaging have good reproducibility.