Abstract:Estimating the effort to develop a software system is an important project management concern. There are a number of different effort estimation techniques currently in use in the software industry. They fall into three general categories: expert judgment-based techniques, algorithmic model-based techniques and learning-oriented techniques. Expert judgment-based techniques are the techniques in most frequent use. They are useful in the absence of quantified, empirical data. However, ″intuitive″ processes constitute a major part of the expert estimation. It is difficult to articulate the estimation process and achieve organizational learning. Algorithmic model-based techniques attempt to represent the relationship between effort and one or more project characteristics. The existing algorithmic models, however, fail to produce accurate estimates of the development effort. There are four main disadvantages with these models. First, there is the problem of software sizing. Obtaining consistent size estimates and interpreting such estimates require high skill levels and good judgment. Secondly, there is the issue of historical data. Researchers have proposed models based on site-specific historical data, so these models can't be applied to local development circumstances. Thirdly, the dominant method of data analysis has been in linear regression. A good regression model needs a relatively large dataset which can be a problem in the software estimation field. Furthermore, the underlying assumptions of regression analysis are often questionable. Finally, many models estimate the effort for the later stages of the development process but almost ignore the early stages. Learning-oriented techniques are based on artificial intelligence techniques. Learning-oriented techniques don't require any function form assumption, as opposed to algorithmic models and they are good at modeling complex non-linear relationships. The performance of the learning-oriented techniques is to a large degree dependent on the large dataset for training or analogy. Each of the existing techniques for effort estimation has its advantages and disadvantages. No single technique is best for all situations, and all techniques are challenged by the rapid pace of change in the software technology. In order to improve estimation accuracy, a software development organization should: (1) select proper estimation techniques according to specific project characteristics and information availability; (2) combine more estimation techniques to improve effort estimates; (3) adapt algorithmic models to local circumstances; (4) develop their own store of projects; (5) estimate the effort for the whole development process, considering the effort of the early stages sufficiently.

Databases for Estimating Task Element Times: An Overview

A Comparison of Effort Estimation Techniques in Software Development Projects

Estimate Test Execution Effort at an Early Stage: an Empirical Study

An Experience-Based Approach for Test Execution Effort Estimation

Multiple Measures of Monitoring Mental Workload

Facilitating Cooperation in Global Software Design via Micro-Estimation

Execution Time Analysis for Industrial Control Applications

A Method for Estimating the Cycle Time of Business Processes with Many-to-many Relationships among the Resources and Activities Based on Individual Worklists

DBMS metrology

Time-Aware Models for Software Effort Estimation

Efficient Collaborative Task Arrangement In Global Software Design Via Micro-Estimation And Pert Technique

DBMS metrology: measuring query time

Optimization-based estimation of the execution time of a robotic assembly task sequence

Database performance evaluation in an indexed file environment

Knowledge Based Micro-Estimation in Task Arrangement for Cooperative Global Software Design

A Knowledge-Based Approach for Calculating Setup Times

Software cost estimation with incomplete data

Performance Study of Time Series Databases

An Integrated BIM System to Track the Time and Cost of Construction Projects: A Case Study

Buying time in software development: how estimates become commitments?