Studying Doppler Ultrasound Indices of Uterine Artery in Cases of Endometrial Cancer in Al Shatby University Hospital Patients

Hossam H. El Sokkary,Ali Abd Elkarim Farahat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-022-00689-y
2022-12-23
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Abstract:BackgroundEndometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer worldwide. Abnormal uterine bleeding is the cardinal symptom and the presenting symptom in about 75–90% of the cases. But abnormal uterine bleeding is a very common presentation and caused by many causes, most of them are benign, described by International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) as PALM-COEIN acronym. Endometrial sampling and biopsy taking should be done to document endometrial cancer diagnosis in all high-risk patients for endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia. Unfortunately, some cases of endometrial cancer can be missed even after traditional endometrial sampling due to blinded procedure and the percentage increases in Pipelle aspirator. The need of a soft marker that supports the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and guide for endometrial sampling biopsy by hysteroscopy from the start or to repeat the endometrial sampling by hysteroscopy is important. Doppler ultrasonographic examination of the uterine artery can be this soft marker.Aim of the Work.To study the role of uterine artery Doppler indices in endometrial cancer and to compare its indices with the Doppler indices of uterine artery in atypical hyperplasia/ endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and abnormal uterine bleeding caused by dysfunctional causes or endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.Patients and MethodsThe study was conducted on three groups of abnormal uterine bleeding, each group included 30 patients distributed as follows: group A endometrial cancer patients, group B atypical endometrial hyperplasia patients/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and group C benign causes of abnormal uterine bleeding. Uterine artery Doppler examination was done through vaginal ultrasound scan, and its indices pulsatility and resistance index were calculated and documented to all patients of the three groups. Exclusion criteria include organic causes of abnormal uterine bleeding as fibroid, adenomyosis, pelvic inflammatory diseases, ovarian masses and pelvic endometriosis as these lesions can affect vascularity of uterine artery.ResultIn relation to comparison between the three studied groups regarding resistance index, it was found that there was a significant decrease in resistance index in endometrial cancer patients group A compared to the atypical endometrial hyperplasia group B (P1 = 0.032) and abnormal uterine bleeding patients due to benign causes group C (P2 = 0.006). In relation to comparison between the three studied groups regarding pulsatility index, it was found that there was a significant difference between group A and B (P1 = 0.0021), group A and C (P2 = 0.0001).ConclusionUterine artery Doppler indices namely resistance index and pulsatility index are significantly lower in endometrial cancer than in atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and abnormal uterine bleeding caused by dysfunctional causes and endometrial hyperplasia without atypia and can be used as a screening tool for endometrial cancer prediction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?