Comparison of teacher-related accreditation system in child education institutions: Indicators in Korea, United States, Australia, and New Zealand
Jaejin Park,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2022.22.13.447
2022-07-15
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Abstract:Objectives This study examined teacher-related accreditation system in Korea's kindergarten and daycare center to see if the contents related to teachers are properly evaluated, and compared them to those of accreditation system conducted in other countries. Methods To this end, from five accreditation systems, Korea's 5th Period Kindergarten accreditation system, Daycare Center accreditation system, the NAEYC accreditation system in the United States, the ACECQA accreditation system in Australia, and the ERO accreditation system in New Zealand, teacher-related information was extracted, coded according to standard of analysis, and thereby the analysis of frequency was executed per item. Results The analysis results are as follows. First, the accreditation of kindergartens in Korea, NAEYC in the United States, and ERO in New Zealand included a larger number of items compared to the accreditation system of daycare centers in Korea and ACECQA in Australia. Second, regarding the assessment of “Teacher management”, the role of the teacher is the sub-scale with the largest number among items in the five accreditation systems, while the qualification of the teacher is the sub-scale with the smallest nunmber among items in the five accreditation systems. Third, regarding the assessment of “Teacher relationship”, the relationship with colleagues is the sub-scale with the largest number among items in the five accreditation systems, while the relationship with parents is the sub-scale with the smallest nunmber among items in the five accreditation systems. Conclusions Through these analysis results, it was suggested that both of the accreditation systems in Korea should be supplemented to the contents on the relationship with learners and education and training of teachers. Also, it was proposed that the contents of the accreditation systems for kindergartens and daycare centers should be complemented each other, and that the accreditation systems need to be modified and supplemented for parts requiring commonality.