Abstract:The Warsaw Loss and Damage Mechanism holds high appeal for complementing actions on climate change adaptation and mitigation, and for delivering needed support for tackling intolerable climate related-risks that will neither be addressed by mitigation nor by adaptation. Yet, negotiations under the UNFCCC are caught between demands for climate justice, understood as compensation, for increases in extreme and slow-onset event risk, and the reluctance of other parties to consider Loss and Damage outside of an adaptation framework. Working towards a jointly acceptable position we suggest an actionable way forward for the deliberations may be based on aligning comprehensive climate risk analytics with distributive and compensatory justice considerations. Our proposed framework involves in a short-medium term, needs-based perspective support for climate risk management beyond countries ability to absorb risk. In a medium-longer term, liability-based perspective we particularly suggest to consider liabilities attributable to anthropogenic climate change and associated impacts. We develop the framework based on principles of need and liability, and identify the policy space for Loss and Damage as composed of curative and transformative measures. Transformative measures, such as managed retreat, have already received attention in discussions on comprehensive climate risk management. Curative action is less clearly defined, and more contested. Among others, support for a climate displacement facility could qualify here. For both sets of measures, risk financing (such as ‘climate insurance’) emerges as an entry point for further policy action, as it holds potential for both risk management as well as compensation functions. To quantify the Loss and Damage space for specific countries, we suggest as one option to build on a risk layering approach that segments risk and risk interventions according to risk tolerance. An application to fiscal risks in Bangladesh and at the global scale provides an estimate of countries’ financial support needs for dealing with intolerable layers of flood risk. With many aspects of Loss and Damage being of immaterial nature, we finally suggest that our broad risk and justice approach in principle can also see application to issues such as migration and preservation of cultural heritage.

Is the Longue Durée a Legal Argument?: Understanding Takings Doctrine in Climate Change and Settler Colonial Contexts in the United States

The Public Life of Private Law: Tort Law as a Risk Regulation Mechanism

Legal geography and coastal climate change adaptation: the Vaughan litigation

Community-led relocations and the use of buyouts as an adaptation to climate change-induced flooding and erosion

The Risk and Policy Space for Loss and Damage: Integrating Notions of Distributive and Compensatory Justice with Comprehensive Climate Risk Management

The Influence of the Paris Agreement on Climate Litigation: Causation, Corporate Governance and Catalyst (Part II)

Climate policy must account for community-specific socio-economic, health, and biophysical conditions—evidence from coastal Alaska

Litigating climate change through international law: Obligations strategy and rights strategy

Multilevel governance, climate (in)justice, and settler colonialism—evidence from First Nations disaster evacuations in so-called Canada

Climate Change Mitigation through Civil Procedure? Justiciability in Two Nordic Climate Cases

Water Law and Planning Frameworks Under Climate Change Variability: Systemic and Adaptive Management of Flood Risk

Environmental subjectivities and experiences of climate extreme-driven loss and damage in northern Australia

Whose everyday climate cultures? Environmental subjectivities and invisibility in climate change discourse

Climate Change Litigation: Chronicles from the Global South. A Comparative Study

Courts as Decision-Makers on Sea Level Rise Adaptation Measures: Lessons from New Zealand

Environmental Litigation: Law and Strategy

Reshaping Louisiana’s Coastal Frontier: Managed Retreat as Colonial Decontextualization

Climate Change Law and Brazil: Climate Litigation As the Ultimate Ratio?

Distributional Considerations for Transboundary Risk Governance of Environmental Threats

On Micropolitics: Climate adaptation and Indigenous governance in Western Alaska

When climate meets real estate: A survey of the literature