Abstract:Background: The concept of dual mobility of total hip arthroplasties (THA) is a revolution in the prevention of dislocations and in the treatment of instability. Its use remains controversial in patients under 60 years old, providing poorer results with first generation cups coated with alumina. This study, carried out on modern dual mobility (DM) cups with a porous bilayer coating, in active patients under 60 years of age aimed to evaluate: (1) the mechanical survival of two latest generation DM THA, with failure defined as revision of acetabular or femoral implants for mechanical loosening, by comparing a tripod cup to a full pressfit cup, (2) to evaluate the complications, (3) to compare the rate of radiographic peri-prosthetic osteolysis between the 2 implants. Hypothesis: The hypothesis was that the medium-term survival of modern DM cups placed in young patients was the same regardless of the type of acetabular fixation used. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of 119 latest generation DM THA with standard polyethylene, composed of 66 full pressfit cups and 53 tripod fixation cups, used in primary arthroplasty in 111 patients between 2005 and 2016. The survival study was carried out using medical records. The clinical evaluation was carried out using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) as well as the self-administered Hip and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Oxford-12 questionnaires. Radiological analysis was carried out on radiographs looking for bone demineralization and acetabular and femoral lines. Results: At 8.6 years (5-16), no revision for mechanical loosening was observed regardless of the type of cup. The prosthesis dislocation rate (large joint) was 1.7%: 1 case in each group (p = 1), including one revision required in the full pressfit group. Three revisions for mechanical complications were recorded: a recurrent dislocating hip on a full pressfit cup that was not sufficiently anteverted, an acetabular peri-prosthetic fracture on a full pressfit cup and a case of iliopsoas impingement with a retroverted tripod cup. The survival rate for all-cause revision was 93.8% for pressfit (95% CI: 88.2%-99.9%) vs. 96.2% for tripod (95% CI: 91.1%-100%) (p = 0.63) and for revision due to any cause excluding infection, 96.9% for pressfit (95% CI: 92.8%-100%) vs. 98.1% for tripod (95% CI: 94.4%-100%) (p = 0.7). The rate of periacetabular osteolysis was 11%, significantly more present amongst tripod cups (24%, 9 cases) compared to full pressfit cups (2%, 1 case) (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This series demonstrates good performance of 3rd generation DM cups with porous bilayer coating in patients under 60 years of age regardless of the type of acetabular fixation, at 8.6 years of follow-up. The rate of osteolysis around full pressfit cups remains very low, unlike that of tripod cups. The use of Double Mobility prostheses for primary hip osteoarthritis is possible in young patients, preferably with full pressfit cups (i.e., without any pegs or additional screws that may promote diffusion of polyethylene debris and osteolysis). Level of evidence: III; comparative retrospective study.

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cemented Dual Mobility Cup into a Fully Porous Multihole Cup with Variable Angle Locking Screws for Acetabular Fractures in the Frail Elderly

[Mid-Term Follow-Up Study of Hip Arthroplasty for Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly].

Clinical and Radiographic Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Collum Femoris Preserving Prosthesis:an over 5 Years Follow Up

Use of Cementless Acetabular Component and Cemented Femoral Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cementless Cups and Femoral Head Autografts for Patients with Hip Dysplasia and Osteoarthritis

Primary stability of multi-hole acetabular cup combined with posterior column plating for the fixation of complex acetabular fractures in elderly patients: a biomechanical analysis

[Total Hip Arthroplasty with Uncemented Cup and Femoral Head Autografts for Coxarthrosis Due to Dysplasia].

Cup-Cage Construct for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean Follow-Up of 7.7 Years

Total hip arthroplasty with monobloc press-fit acetabular components and large-diameter bearings for atypical acetabula is safe: a consecutive case series of 125 hips with mean follow-up of 9 years

Total hip arthroplasties in 190 cases: follow-up study]

Application of Jumbo Cup in Acetabular Revisions for Patients with Massive Acetabular Bone Deficiency

Results of third generation dual mobility total hip arthroplasties with non-cross-linked polyethylene in patients under 60 years of age: comparative study of full pressfit vs. tripod cups after 8.6 years

Dual mobility cup in hip fracture: Indications and clinical results compared with bipolar hip arthroplasty

Using Porous Tantalum Uncemented Components to Manage Acetabular Defects and to Restore the Hip Center of Rotation in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum Ten-Year Clinical and Radiological Study

Total hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fracture fixation failure

The Use of Dual-Mobility Implants Through a Direct Anterior Approach as a Safe and Effective Technique for Revision Hip Arthroplasty: The Two-Year Follow-Up of a Case Series

Acetabular erosion after bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients: a retrospective study

Excellent mid-term outcomes with a hemispheric titanium porous-coated acetabular component for total hip arthroplasty: 7-10 year follow-up

Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of old acetabular fracture Mellitus

Mid-Term Follow-Up of Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using Jumbo Cups