Motion artifact correction in cardiac CT using cross-phase temporospatial information and synergistic attention gate and spatial transformer sub-networks
Gong Hao,Zaki Ahmed,Shaojie Chang,Emily Koons,Jamison Thorne,Prabhakar Rajiah,Thomas A Foley,Joel G Fletcher,Cynthia H McCollough,Shuai Leng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad1b6a
IF: 3.5
2024-01-06
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Abstract:Objectives: To improve quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images using a generalizable motion-correction algorithm.
Approach: A neural network with attention gate and spatial transformer (ATOM) was developed to correct coronary motion. Phantom and patient CCTA images (39 males, 32 females, age range 19 to 92, scan date 02/2020 to 10/2021) retrospectively collected from dual-source CT were used to create training, development, and testing sets corresponding to 140- and 75-ms temporal resolution, with 75-ms images as labels. To test generalizability, ATOM was deployed for locally adaptive motion-correction in both 140- and 75-ms patient images. Objective metrics were used to assess motion-corrupted and corrected phantom and patient images, including structural-similarity-index (SSIM), dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), peak-signal-noise-ratio (PSNR), and normalized root-mean-square-error (NRMSE). In objective quality assessment, ATOM was compared with several baseline networks, including U-net, U-net plus attention gate, U-net plus spatial transformer, VDSR, and ResNet. Two cardiac radiologists independently interpreted motion-corrupted and -corrected images at 75 and 140 ms in a blinded fashion and ranked diagnostic image quality (worst to best: 1–4, no ties).
Main results: ATOM improved quality metrics (p<0.05) before/after correction: In phantom, SSIM 0.87/0.95, DSC 0.85/0.93, PSNR 19.4/22.5, NRMSE 0.38/0.27; in patient images, SSIM 0.82 / 0.88, DSC 0.88/0.90, PSNR 30.0/32.0, NRMSE 0.16/0.12. ATOM provided more consistent improvement of objective image quality, compared to the presented baseline networks. The motion-corrected images received better ranks than un-corrected at the same temporal resolution (p<0.05): 140-ms images 1.65/2.25, and 75-ms images 3.1/3.2. The motion-corrected 75-ms images received the best rank in 65% of testing cases. A fair-to-good inter-reader agreement was observed (Kappa score 0.58).
Significance: ATOM reduces motion artifacts, improving visualization of coronary arteries. This algorithm can be used to virtually improve temporal resolution in both single- and dual-source CT.
engineering, biomedical,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging