Abstract:TODO comments play an important role in helping developers to manage their tasks and communicate with other team members. TODO comments are often introduced by developers as a type of technical debt, such as a reminder to add/remove features or a request to optimize the code implementations. These can all be considered as notifications for developers to revisit regarding the current suboptimal solutions. TODO comments often bring short-term benefits – higher productivity or shorter development cost – and indicate attention needs to be paid for the long-term software quality. Unfortunately, due to their lack of knowledge or experience and/or the time constraints, developers sometimes may forget or even not be aware of suboptimal implementations. The loss of the TODO comments for these suboptimal solutions may hurt the software quality and reliability in the long-term. Therefore it is beneficial to remind the developers of the suboptimal solutions whenever they change the code. In this work, we refer this problem to the task of detecting TODO-missed commits , and we propose a novel approach named TDR eminder ( T O D O comment Reminder ) to address the task. With the help of TDR eminder , developers can identify possible missing TODO commits just-in-time when submitting a commit. Our approach has two phases: offline training and online inference. We first embed code change and commit message into contextual vector representations using two neural encoders respectively. The association between these representations is learned by our model automatically.In the online inference phase, TDR eminder leverages the trained model to compute the likelihood of a commit being a TODO-missed commit . We evaluate TDR eminder on datasets crawled from 10k popular Python and Java repositories in GitHub respectively. Our experimental results show that TDR eminder outperforms a set of benchmarks by a large margin in TODO-missed commits detection. Moreover, to better help developers use TDR eminder in practice, we have incorporated Large Language Models (LLMs) with our approach to provide explainable recommendations. The user study shows that our tool can effectively inform developers not only “when” to add TODOs, but also “where” and “what” TODOs should be added, verifying the value of our tool in practical application.

Aide-mémoire: Improving a Project’s Collective Memory via Pull Request–Issue Links

Duplicate Pull Request Detection

Automatic Retrieval Method for Tracing Links Between Code and Chinese Documentation

Just-In-Time TODO-Missed Commits Detection

DeepLink: Recovering issue-commit links based on deep learning

A Method for Identifying References Between Projects in GitHub

Enhancing software artefact traceability recovery processes with link count information

BTLink : automatic link recovery between issues and commits based on pre-trained BERT model

Propagating frugal user feedback through closeness of code dependencies to improve IR-based traceability recovery

MTLink: Adaptive multi-task learning based pre-trained language model for traceability link recovery between issues and commits

Enhancing Software Maintenance: A Learning to Rank Approach for Co-changed Method Identification

EALink: An Efficient and Accurate Pre-trained Framework for Issue-Commit Link Recovery

DeepLink: A Code Knowledge Graph Based Deep Learning Approach for Issue-Commit Link Recovery

LeakPair: Proactive Repairing of Memory Leaks in Single Page Web Applications

Clone-Based and Interactive Recommendation for Modifying Pasted Code

Improving Issue-PR Link Prediction via Knowledge-Aware Heterogeneous Graph Learning

Understanding shared links and their intentions to meet information needs in modern code review:

Linking Code and Documentation Churn: Preliminary Analysis

MaxMind: A Memory Loop Network to Enhance Software Productivity based on Large Language Models

IntelliMerge: a Refactoring-Aware Software Merging Technique

Empirical Evaluation of Bug Linking