Abstract:In the study, we address the problem of existing differences in reading and understanding novel metaphors in the text fragments in native and target languages (L1 and L2), with these differences potentially attributed to both the specifics of forming analogies in native and target languages, and the mapping characteristics of metaphors. The study identifies the contingency effects of several primary metaphors onto the gaze behavior and default interpretation of textual novel metaphors in L1 (Russian) and L2 (English). To proceed, we use the text fragments in L1 and L2 containing novel metaphors appearing in more and less focal syntactic positions in a two-stage oculographic experiment. We obtain the participants’ gaze metrics values and the participants’ responses specifying the target domains of the novel metaphors, which further allows us to disclose the contingencies. Methodologically, the study is grounded in the metaphor processing theories developed in cognitive psychology, which explore the structure of analogical reasoning and associative fluency as manifesting potentially different effects in L1 and L2. To validate it, we also address the cognitive linguistic theories which provide the framework for identifying the primary metaphor models (here the models PATIENT (OBJECT) IS AGENT, PARTS ARE WHOLE, CONCRETE IS ABSTRACT) and for testing their effect onto information construal. We hypothesize that reading and understanding metaphors will proceed differently in L1 and L2, which is attributed to associative fluency in metaphor mapping in native and target languages. The experiment results do not show the differences in understanding the mapping model PATIENT (OBJECT) IS AGENT in L1 and L2, whereas these differences appear in understanding the models PARTS ARE WHOLE and CONCRETE IS ABSTRACT with higher default interpretation index in L1. The model PATIENT (OBJECT) IS AGENT is also found to stimulate higher gaze costs. The results suffice to claim that there are differences in the cognitive costs produced by primary metaphor models, which allows us to range and specify their role in information construal in L1 and L2.

Ways of formation of metaphors in the literary text as realization of the maintenance of nominations of gestures (on the material of the work “Atonement” by I. McEwen)

Metaphorical Code of Perceiving a Literary Text

Cognitive approach experience to the metaphor analysis (on the basis of the navy language)

Mapping models in novel metaphors and their effect on gaze behavior and default interpretations in native and target languages

METAPHOR THE MOST COMMON STYLISTIC TECHNIQUE IN CH. BRONTE’S NOVEL “JANE EYRE” AND METHODS OF ITS TRANSLATION INTO THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE

Metaphorical Competence in Multilingual Context of Language Acquisition and Learning

The Metaphor of Light – Perspectives on Conceptual Metaphors

METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE BRITISH MONARCHY: AXIOLOGICAL ASPECT

Metaphors In Chinese Accompanying Gesture Modality And Cognition

Metaphorical parallels of the neutral nomination "man" in modern English

Metaphor in Literary Prose and its Cross-Cultural Transfer: A Case Study of Jinpingmei and its Two English Versions

Metaphorical Competence in Italian EFL students: an Empirical Study

THE DIFFERENTIATION OF METONYMY AND METAPHOR CONCEPTS IN MODERN LINGUISTICS

Metaphor as a means of constructing artistic reality (by the example of the analysis of the metaphor "centaur" in Meir Shalev's novel "Esav")

SEMANTIC-FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR IN THE LANGUAGE OF WORKS OF POSTMODERNISTS POETS

Monomodal and Multimodal Film Representation of the Metaphor: “Time Passing Is Motion” An Analytical Approach with the Conceptual Integration Model

Drawing as a Tool in Metaphor-Led Discourse Analysis

Exploring the Role of Multimodal Metaphor through Gestures in Middle School English Education

Metaphors in Child Discourse: Interpretive Research from a Participatory Perspective

Metaphtonymic Projections in Digital Multimodal Discourse

Metaphor, discourse dynamics and register: applications to written descriptions of mental health problems