Abstract:This study examines the use of epistemic modality (expressions that signal varying degrees of certainty and subjectivity) by writers of English education research. Epistemic modality is a crucial, yet intricate, rhetorical device through which writers qualify their claims and construct a stance towards their texts and readers. Disciplinary and cultural norms influence the rhetorical use of modality in academic texts. To understand the impact of these contextual factors, linguistic descriptions need to examine discourse produced in individual disciplines and even subdisciplines. Using an exploratory comparative approach, the present study analyzes education research that is produced by native-English-speaking and EFL Arab writers: (1) to describe the discipline-specific practices that are adopted by native writers to manipulate the degrees of certainty and subjectivity in their discourse; and (2) to explore how these practices vary cross-culturally. Sixty research papers are analyzed using the finely grained model of Systemic Functional Linguistics. The findings show a disciplinary preference whereby native writers avoided expressing hesitancy and doubt and preferred a moderately confident epistemic stance to create convincing arguments. These writers’ epistemic style was also objective and detached. The EFL texts, in contrast, were less dialogic and had higher levels of confidence, explicitness, and subjectivity. Although advanced in their linguistic and disciplinary proficiency, the non-native writers displayed some patterns that are generally characteristic of other Arab and non-Arab L2 writers/learners, indicating the vital role that culture and nativeness play in rhetorical strategy use. The paper ends by highlighting the need for explicit instruction of epistemic modality in Arab higher education institutions in order for non-native writers to produce academic texts that are persuasively effective from the perspective of the international academic community.

The role of assessments in providing evasive answers in news interviews

Stacked dynamic memory-coattention network for answering why-questions in Arabic

Dynamic Assessment in Language Learning; An Overview and the Impact of Using Social Media

English Instructors’ Use of Classroom Questions and Question Types in EFL Classrooms

Translation Assessment of Transitivity in Libyan News Discourse

Arabic within culture forensic interviews: Arabic native speaking lay-observer truth and lie accuracy, confidence, and verbal cue selection

Arabic question answering system: a survey

Automated Question Generation for Science Tests in Arabic Language Using NLP Techniques

Assessing the Interactional Competence in English Speaking of Japanese Junior High School Students in an Interview Test

Engagement in On-line Language Assessment: are test-taking skills, self-assessment, resilience, and autonomy critical?

The impact of emotionally evocative information on interpreting accuracy in a mock asylum interview

Item Analysis of Multiple-choice Questions (MCQs): Assessment Tool For Quality Assurance Measures

Investigating the Reasons behind EFL University Teachers’ Use of the Language Avoidance Strategy

Exploring tertiary EFL practitioners’ knowledge base component of assessment literacy: implications for teacher professional development

Efficacy of Role-Play in Teaching and Formative Assessment for Undergraduate English- Major Students in Saudi Arabia

CERTAINTY AND SUBJECTIVITY IN ENGLISH EDUCATION RESEARCH: A CROSS CULTURAL SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS

Authorial Stance in English, Arabic and EFL Applied Linguistics Research: An Appraisal Study

Role of Learning Environment in Arabic as a Foreign Language in Saudi Arabia

Critical Thinking as Reflected in the Sudanese and Jordanian Secondary School Certificate English Language Examinations

Changing the Structure of Paragraphs and Texts in Arabic: A Case from News Reporting

Examining Language Assessment Literacy for Saudi Pre-service EFL Teachers