Study on Design of Participatory Leaning Environment：Based on Bilingual Graduate Course lntroduction to the Learning Sciences
Qiaoqiao CAO,Baohui ZHANG,Leming LlANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-2179.2014.04.008
2014-01-01
Abstract:Using design research methodology, through three iterations in nearly three years, the researchers applied established theories to form design foundations and framework of Participatory Learning Environment ( PLE) for a bi-lingual graduate course, Introduction to the Learning Sciences in Institute of Education, N University. Participatory leaning environment ( PLE) is a type of supportive learning environment which helps students effectively learn through involving in authentic practical activities. In this study, PLE is defined as the integration of a series of supportive con-ditions, where students can acquire knowledge, develop skills and build identity through participating in authentic practical activities, which are closed to their experience. In PLE, students participate in the course not only as learners but as designers, through close collaboration between teacher-students and student-student. Thus, graduate students in Education can get more opportunities to enhance their professional practical skills and develop their identities in their discipline. In order to explore the effectiveness of PLE, the researchers adopted various methods (such as classroom ob-servation, video analysis, questionnaire survey, and interview, etc. ) to record the design process and evolvement of PLE and the developmental trajectories of students in PLE, in order to test the effectiveness of the design of PLE and continually improve PLE based on insights from practice. The result showed that with the progressive improvement of PLE, students ’ participation level and enthusiasm were gradually increasing, except that participants in the first round of course did not fully exercise their rights of co-designers due to design flaws in activities. In the second and third round of the course, students showed strong participation intention and think participat-ing in design is a kind of necessary experience to graduate students in Education, though they also had worries and anxieties because of lack of pedagogy and content knowledge, skills and teaching experience. In addition to progress in content knowledge, practical skills and academic English, the students also reported positive outcomes on their con-cept of learning, collaboration competency, communication skills, reflection skills, and general academic skills, through learning in PLE. Results showed that time and energy, motivation, previous knowledge and experience, professional knowledge and skills, and group collaboration are important factors which influence students’ participation as co-designers in PLE. Interpersonal interaction and collective collaboration are important mechanism which can ensure and enhance students’ participation in PLE. Based on the process and results of this study, the researchers clrew the following con-clusions for reference:(1) PLE is an open system which is characterized by mutual construction between students and learning environment. Learners can develop themselves by using various mediated artifacts and push forward PLE’ s evolvement concurrently. (2) PLE creates conditions for attracting students to actively take part in the course. Along with increasing ownership and control of the course, learners’ participation level and satisfactory can be also promo-ted. Thus, course objectives can be achieved more successfully. (3) PLE provides opportunities for students’ profes-sional development. By participating in design practice, learners can build their understanding about subject content and internalize tacit knowledge of their discipline. (4) PLE sets up a platform for the formation of partnership between faculty and students. Mutual beneficial partnership between faculty and students can be formed by sharing understand-ing and responsibilities. (5) PLE provides a new way to promote changes in course and instruction. As co-designers who have great agency, students can strengthen their understanding about educational innovations by continually dis-cussing and negotiating with teacher/teaching team, and promote changes to get sustainable and scalable development in real educational settings.