Self-assessment of olfactory function using the “Sniffin’ Sticks”

Yiling Mai,Marie Klockow,Antje Haehner,Thomas Hummel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07872-7
2023-02-17
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Abstract:Abstract Background A precise and reliable test of the olfactory function is indispensable for the diagnosis of the olfactory disorder (OD). Despite of this, in a clinical context, often there is no place in daily routine for time-consuming procedures. This study aimed to examine if the assessment of olfactory function using the “Sniffin’ Sticks” is suitable for self-assessment. Methods Participants comprised 84 healthy control subjects (HC) and 37 OD patients. The “Sniffin’ Sticks” test battery consisting of odor threshold (T), discrimination (D) and identification (I) tests was used for self- and assisted assessments. To save time, we applied the 8-item wide step version of the T test and the 8-item D test, whereas the I task remained the same as the original version. The whole test included two sessions, with each session comprising a self-assessment part performed by the participants themselves, and an assisted-assessment part performed by the examiner. Results Sniffin’ Sticks self-assessment was efficient in distinguishing between self-reported HC subjects and OD patients ( p ’s 0.05). In the self-administered I and TDI tests, there was a moderate to excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.51–0.93, p ’s < 0.01), and a strong to excellent correlation with the assisted assessment ( r = 0.71–0.92, p ’s < 0.01). However, the self-administered T and D tests only exhibited low to moderate test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.30–0.72, p ’s < 0.05) and correlations with the assisted test ( r = 0.31–0.62, p ’s < 0.05). Conclusions The Identification self-test is appropriate to be solely applied, and is therefore an easy-to-use alternative for olfactory screening in a larger segment of patients. The whole “Sniffin’ Sticks” self-test also shows good measurement properties and is therefore a suitable backup in clinical practice, but improvement is needed due to the simplified D and T self-test.
otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?