The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale
M C Mangano,M Berlino,L Corbari,G Milisenda,M Lucchese,S Terzo,M Bosch-Belmar,M S Azaza,J M F Babarro,R Bakiu,B R Broitman,A H Buschmann,R Christofoletti,Y Dong,B Glamuzina,O Luthman,P Makridis,A J A Nogueira,M G Palomo,R Dineshram,P Sanchez-Jerez,H Sevgili,M Troell,K Y AbouelFadl,M N Azra,P Britz,E Carrington,I Celić,F Choi,C Qin,M A Dionísio,T Dobroslavić,P Galli,D Giannetto,J H Grabowski,B Helmuth,M J H Lebata-Ramos,P T Lim,Y Liu,S M Llorens,S Mirto,M Pećarević,C Pita,N Ragg,E Ravagnan,D Saidi,K Schultz,M Shaltout,S H Tan,V Thiyagarajan,G Sarà
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.014
Abstract:The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high-quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems; extensive vs. intensive methods; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster-driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.