Abstract:Background: Measures of lumbar lordosis (LL) and elliptical modeling variables have been shown to discriminate between normal and chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. Pelvic morphology influences an individual's sagittal lumbar alignment. Our purpose is to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of lumbar sagittal radiographic alignment and modeling variables to identify if these can discriminate between normal controls and CLBP patients. Methods: We conducted a computer analysis of digitized vertebral body corners on lateral lumbar radiographs of normal controls and CLBP patients. Fifty normal controls were attained from a required pre-employment physical examination (29 men; 21 women; mean age of 27.7 ± 8.5 years), with no history of low back pain, a normal spinal examination, no pathologies, anomalies, or instability. Additionally, 50 CLBP patients (29 men; 29.5 ± 8 years of age) were randomly chosen and matched to the characteristics of the controls. The inclusion criteria required no abnormalities on lumbar spine radiographs. The parameters included the following: ARA L1-L5 lordosis, ARA T12-S1 lordosis, Cobb T12-S1, b/a elliptical modelling ratio, sacral base angle (SBA), and S1 posterior tangent to vertical (PTS1). Two measures of pelvic morphology were determined for each person—the angle of pelvic incidence (API) and posterior tangent pelvic incidence angle (PTPIA)—and the relationships between API − ARA T12-S1, API − Cobb T12-S1, and API − ARA L1-5 was determined. Descriptive statistics and correlations among the primary variables were determined. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) for primary variables were analyzed. Results: The mean values of LL were statistically different between the normal and CLBP groups (p 0.05). API had a stronger correlation to the SBA and Cobb T12-S1 than PTPIA did, while PTPIA had a stronger correlation to the S1 tangent and ARA T12-S1 than API did. While CLBP patients had a stronger correlation of ARA T12-S1 and Cobb T12-S1 relative to the pelvic morphology, they also had a reduced correlation of ARA L1-L5 lordosis relative to their SBA and pelvic morphology measures. API − T12-S1, API − L1-L5, and API − Cobb T12-S1 were statistically different between the groups, p < 0.001. Using ROC curve analyses, it was identified that ARA L1-L5 lordosis of 36° and ARA T12-S1 of 68° have a good sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between normal and CLBP patients. ROC curve analyses identified that lordosis ARAT12-S1 < 68° (AUC = 0.83), lordosis ARAL1-L5 < 36° (AUC = 0.78), API − ARA T12-S1 35° (AUC = 0.71), and API − Cobb T12-S1 < −5° (AUC = 0.69) had moderate to good discrimination between groups (AUC = 0.83, 0.78, 0.75, and 0.72). Conclusions: Pelvic morphology is similar between normal and CLBP patients. CLBP patients have an abnormal 'fit' of their API − ARAT12-S1 and L1-L5 lumbar lordosis relative to their pelvic morphology and sacral tilt shown as a hypolordosis.

Predicting the ideal apex of lumbar lordosis based on individual pelvic incidence and inflection point in asymptomatic adults

The factors influencing the adjustment function of PI on spinal sagittal balance in normal subject

Estimation of the Ideal Lumbar Lordosis to be restored from Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Predictive Formula for Chinese Population

Radiographic analysis of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment and prediction of lumbar lordosis in Chinese asymptomatic subjects

Introduction of a Novel “Segmentation Line” to Analyze the Variations in Segmental Lordosis, Location of the Lumbar Apex, and Their Correlation with Spinopelvic Parameters in Asymptomatic Adults

Impact of Pelvic Anteversion on Spinopelvic Alignment in an Asymptomatic Population: a Dynamic Perspective of Standing and Sitting

Using spinopelvic parameters to estimate residual lumbar lordosis assuming previous lumbosacral fusion-a study of normative values

Analysis of L5 Incidence in Normal Population Use of L5 Incidence As a Guide in Reconstruction of Lumbosacral Alignment.

An Analysis of the Interactions Between the Spine, Pelvis, and Lower Limbs in Asymptomatic Adults with Limited Pelvic Compensation.

Could pelvic parameters determine optimal postoperative thoracic kyphosis in Lenke type 1 AIS patients?

Lumbofemoral Angle: A Novel Sagittal Parameter Related to Quality of Life in Patients with Adult Scoliosis

Analysis of Spino-pelvic Sagittal Alignment in Young Chinese Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Radiographic analysis of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic Chinese adults

Lumbar Apex Position as an Independent Risk Factor for Adjacent Segment Diseases in Patients Undergoing Short-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Validation of Age-Adjusted Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis and Lordosis Distribution Index for Assessing Adjacent-Segment Disease after Short-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Minimum 5 Years of Follow-Up.

Radiographic Patterns and Characteristics of Sagittal Profiles in Normal Spinopelvic Curvatures: an Explicit Depiction of the Distribution of Lumbar Vertebral Bodies and Discs

The Impact of Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis on Pelvic Shape and Sagittal Alignment

Can the Mismatch of Measured Pelvic Morphology vs. Lumbar Lordosis Predict Chronic Low Back Pain Patients?

Age-based normal sagittal alignment in Chinese asymptomatic adults: establishment of the relationships between pelvic incidence and other parameters

Prediction formulae of sagittal alignment in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis after osteotomy

Optimal Correction of Adult Spinal Deformities Requires Restoration of Distal Lumbar Lordosis