Plagiarism in retranslation: The Sound and the Fury

İrem Ceren DOĞAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1164920
2022-08-21
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi
Abstract:Retranslation is a topic focused by translation scholars on its different aspects nowadays. Retranslation studies are based on the retranslation hypothesis associated with Antoine Berman, Paul Bensimon, and Yves Gambier. Following the increase in retranslations in the 21st century, research on retranslation has also gained momentum. More recent research has focused on different aspects of retranslations as products, particularly those found problematic in the retranslation hypothesis. The increase in retranslations as products of the literature market raises the problem of plagiarism. However, it has been observed that the retranslation hypothesis or criticisms of the hypothesis do not focus much on plagiarism. The difficulty of determining the parameters of plagiarism makes it difficult to work on this subject, especially in descriptive studies. Within the scope of this study, we will focus on two commercially available translations of the famous work of modernist writer William Faulkner, Sound and Fury. In the first part of the study, retranslation and plagiarism in retranslation will be discussed. Then, plagiarism of retranslation in Turkey will be scrutinized. In the last part, a case analysis will be made. In this context, the text related to plagiarism suspicion will be compared with the translation of the famous first translator of the work, Rasih Güran, which has been on the market for over 40 years and continues to be published today. This review will focus on commercial triggers of plagiarism in retranslations. The analysis will be made through the examples taken from the general flow of the novel, the footnotes and the examples taken from the section explaining characters of the novel added to the work by William Faulkner.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?