Abstract:Background Determining kidney function in critically ill patients is paramount for the dose adjustment of several medications. When assessing kidney function, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is generally estimated either by calculating urine creatinine clearance (UCrCl) or using a predictive equation. Unfortunately, all predictive equations have been derived for medical outpatients. Therefore, the validity of predictive equations is of concern when compared with that of the UCrCl method, particularly in medical critically ill patients. Therefore, we conducted this study to assess the agreement of the estimated GFR (eGFR) using common predictive equations and UCrCl in medical critical care setting. Methods This was the secondary analysis of a nutrition therapy study. Urine was collected from participating patients over 24 h for urine creatinine, urine nitrogen, urine volume, and serum creatinine measurements on days 1, 3, 5, and 14 of the study. Subsequently, we calculated UCrCl and eGFR using four predictive equations, the Cockcroft–Gault (CG) formula, the four and six-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD-4 and MDRD-6) equations, and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. The correlation and agreement between eGFR and UCrCl were determined using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman plot with multiple measurements per subject, respectively. The performance of each predictive equation for estimating GFR was reported as bias, precision, and absolute percentage error (APE). Results A total of 49 patients with 170 urine samples were included in the final analysis. Of 49 patients, the median age was 74 (21–92) years-old and 49% was male. All patients were hemodynamically stable with mean arterial blood pressure of 82 (65–108) mmHg. Baseline serum creatinine was 0.93 (0.3–4.84) mg/dL and baseline UCrCl was 46.69 (3.40–165.53) mL/min. The eGFR from all the predictive equations showed modest correlation with UCrCl (r: 0.692 to 0.759). However, the performance of all the predictive equations in estimating GFR compared to that of UCrCl was poor, demonstrating bias ranged from −8.36 to −31.95 mL/min, precision ranged from 92.02 to 166.43 mL/min, and an unacceptable APE (23.01% to 47.18%). Nevertheless, the CG formula showed the best performance in estimating GFR, with a small bias (−2.30 (−9.46 to 4.86) mL/min) and an acceptable APE (14.72% (10.87% to 23.80%)), especially in patients with normal UCrCl. Conclusion From our finding, CG formula was the best eGFR formula in the medical critically ill patients, which demonstrated the least bias and acceptable APE, especially in normal UCrCl patients. However, the predictive equation commonly used to estimate GFR in critically ill patients must be cautiously applied due to its large bias, wide precision, and unacceptable error, particularly in renal function impairment.

Which glomerular filtration rate estimation formula should be used for nephrological evaluation in patients with common variable immune deficiency

Prospective Comparison of 24-Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates in Chronic Renal Disease Patients of African Descent

Comparison of Three Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equations with 24-Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance Measurement in Potential Living Kidney Donors

MDRD, CKD-Epi and Creatinine Clearance with 24-Hour Urine Collection Results in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

MO1026: Performance of Creatinine and Cystatin-Based Estimates of GFR in Paediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients. Comparison of the CKD-EPI Age- Adjusted Creatinine eGFR with Previous Formulas

Collaboration equation for estimating glomerular fi ltration rate in the Chinese population

Correlation of eGFR By MDRD and CKD-EPI Formula with Creatinine Clearance Estimation in CKD Patients and Healthy Subjects.

Relationship of Creatinine and Cystatin C-based Estimated Glomerular Filtration rates with Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate in Healthy Kidney Donors from South Asia

Comparative study of glomerular filtration rate estimatation by formulae using two different methods for creatinine estimation in chronic kidney disease

Evaluation of Four Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Formulae in Application of Health Examination Population

Glomerular filtration rate correlation and agreement between common predictive equations and standard 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance in medical critically ill patients

A comparison of four established GFR formulas to estimate measured GFR and changes in GFR in adult kidney transplant recipients

Accuracy of GFR estimation formula in determination of glomerular filtration rate in kidney donors: Comparison with 24 h urine creatinine clearance.

Combining Cystatin C and Creatinine Yields a Reliable Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Older Adults in Contrast to β-Trace Protein and β2-Microglobulin

Correlation between cystatin C-based formulas, Schwartz formula and urinary creatinine clearance for glomerular filtration rate estimation in children with kidney disease

Comparison of the usefulness of selected formulas for GFR estimation in patients with diagnosed chronic kidney disease

Comparison of cystatin C‐based estimated glomerular filtration rate with measured glomerular filtration rate in a pediatric cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease

Predictive performance of glomerular filtration rate equations based on cystatin C, creatinine and their combination in critically ill patients

Evaluation of the applicability of three prediction equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in children with chronic kidney disease

Diagnostic Accuracy of Various Glomerular Filtration Rates Estimating Equations in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

The Performance of Equations That Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate against Measured Urinary Creatinine Clearance in Critically Ill Patients