Robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thymic epithelial tumours, from the european society of thoracic surgeons database
Akshay J Patel,Alexander Smith,ESTS Thymus Collaborative Steering Group,Enrico Ruffini,Andrea Bille,Podobed Alexandr,Liberman Moishe,Pascal Thomas,Gabryel Piotr,Aigner Clemens,Aresu Giuseppe,Coonar Aman,Nizami Maria,Jimenez Marcelo,Van Schil Paul,Voltolini Luca,Casiraghi Monica,Spaggiari Lorenzo,Ampollini Luca,Carmargo Spencer,Londero Francesco,Schmitt-Opitz Isabelle,Scarci Marco,Turna Akif,Esch Mathhias,Venuta Federico,Mendogni Paolo,Moreno-Mata Nicolas,Martelo Fernando,Elkhayat Hussein,Fitzmaurice Gerald,Szanto Zalan,Moser Bernhard,Lyberis Paraskevas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae346
2024-09-26
Abstract:Objectives: Minimally invasive thymectomy is an accepted approach for early-stage thymic epithelial neoplasia, reducing pain and length of stay compared to open surgery. In this study we compare robotic and video-assisted thymectomy to assess pathological resection status, overall and disease-free survival. Methods: Data were retrieved from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons prospectively maintained thymic database. 82 international centers were invited to participate in the ESTS registry. Thirty-seven centres agreed to take part. We included all patients who had undergone complete thymectomy for malignancy through a minimally invasive approach and excluded patients in whom complete data was not available. Results: Between October 2001 and May 2021, a total of 899 patients with thymic malignancy underwent minimal access surgical resection and were included in the study. A propensity matched analysis was conducted with interrogation of 732 patients. Median age was 55 years, and 408 (56%) patients were female. Propensity matched was performed with 1:1 matching for surgical approach (Video-assisted = 366, Robot-assisted = 366). Robot- assisted surgery conferred significantly lower odds of incomplete resection (R1) (0.203 95% CI 0.13-0.317; p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in terms of overall and disease-free survival between the two techniques. Conclusions: In this analysis, after adjusting for thymoma stage, the odds of incomplete surgical resection were higher in patients undergoing video-assisted surgery than robotic. However, there was no difference in overall or disease-free survival. With data maturation and increased follow-up, this would need repeat analysis and perhaps may provide more credence to the concept of a prospective randomized study to compare outcomes in thymic epithelial neoplasia by surgical approach with a standardized pathological work-up.