Abstract:The popularity of Android platform on mobile devices has attracted much attention from many developers and researchers, as well as malware writers. Recently, Jamrozik et al. proposed a technique to secure Android applications referred to as mining sandboxes. They used an automated test case generation technique to explore the behavior of the app under test and then extracted a set of sensitive APIs that were called. Based on the extracted sensitive APIs, they built a sandbox that can block access to APIs not used during testing. However, they only evaluated the proposed technique with benign apps but not investigated whether it was effective in detecting malicious behavior of malware that infects benign apps. Furthermore, they only investigated one test case generation tool (i.e., Droidmate) to build the sandbox, while many others have been proposed in the literature. In this work, we complement Jamrozik et al.'s work in two ways: (1) we evaluate the effectiveness of mining sandboxes on detecting malicious behaviors; (2) we investigate the effectiveness of multiple automated test case generation tools to mine sandboxes. To investigate effectiveness of mining sandboxes in detecting malicious behaviors, we make use of pairs of malware and benign app it infects. We build a sandbox based on sensitive APIs called by the benign app and check if it can identify malicious behaviors in the corresponding malware. To generate inputs to apps, we investigate five popular test case generation tools: Monkey, Droidmate, Droidbot, GUIRipper, and PUMA. We conduct two experiments to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of these test case generation tools on detecting malicious behavior. In the first experiment, we select 10 apps and allow test case generation tools to run for one hour; while in the second experiment, we select 102 pairs of apps and allow the test case generation tools to run for one minute. Our experiments highlight that 75.5%-77.2% of malware in our dataset can be uncovered by mining sandboxes - showing its power to protect Android apps. We also find that Droidbot performs best in generating test cases for mining sandboxes, and its effectiveness can be further boosted when coupled with other test case generation tools.

Circumventing Google Play vetting policies: a stealthy cyberattack that uses incremental updates to breach privacy

AirBag: Boosting Smartphone Resistance to Malware Infection.

Hey, You, Get off of My Market: Detecting Malicious Apps in Official and Alternative Android Markets.

RiskRanker: scalable and accurate zero-day android malware detection.

Dissecting Android Malware: Characterization and Evolution

Detecting Passive Content Leaks and Pollution in Android Applications.

Detecting Repackaged Smartphone Applications in Third-Party Android Marketplaces

Mining Sandboxes: Are We There Yet?

Reviving Android Malware with DroidRide: and How Not To.

Android HIV: A Study of Repackaging Malware for Evading Machine-Learning Detection

Detection and Prevention of Malware in Android Operating System

Towards Privacy-Preserving Malware Detection Systems for Android

Malware Collusion Attack Against SVM: Issues and Countermeasures

Malware Collusion Attack Against Machine Learning Based Methods: Issues and Countermeasures

Catch Me If You Can: Evaluating Android Anti-Malware Against Transformation Attacks

FairPlay: Fraud and Malware Detection in Google Play

App in the Middle

The rise of obfuscated Android malware and impacts on detection methods

A Novel Attack against Android Phones

Problem-Space Evasion Attacks in the Android OS: a Survey

Sidewinder: Targeted attack against Android in the golden age of ad libraries