Abstract:In June 2012, the German Medical Association (Bundesärztekammer) published the statistics of medical malpractice for 2011 (published at http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de). Still ENT-specific accusations of medical malpractice are by far the fewest in the field of hospitals and actually even in the outpatient context. Clearly most of the unforeseen incidents still occur in the disciplines of trauma surgery and orthopedics. In total, however, an increasing number of errors in treatment can be noticed on the multidisciplinary level: in 25.5% of the registered cases, an error in treatment was found to be the origin of damage to health justifying a claim for compensation of the patient. In the year before, it was only 24.7%. The reasons may be manifold, but the medical system itself certainly plays a major role in this context: the recent developments related to health policy lead to a continuous economisation of medical care. Rationing and limited remuneration more and more result in the fact that therapeutic decision are not exclusively made for the benefit of the patient but that they are oriented at economic or bureaucratic aspects. Thus, in the long term, practising medicine undergoes a change. According to the §§ 1, 3 of the professional code of conduct for doctors (Musterberufsordnung für Ärzte; MBO-Ä) medical practice as liberal profession is principally incompatible with the pursuit of profit, however, even doctors have to earn money which more and more makes him play the role of a businessman. Lack of personnel and staff savings lead to excessive workloads of physicians, caregivers, and nurses, which also favour errors. The quality and even the confidential relationship between doctor and patient, which is important for the treatment success, are necessarily affected by the cost pressure. The victims in this context are not only the patients but also the physicians find themselves in the continuous conflict between ethical requirements of their profession and the actual requirements of the realities in the healthcare field. But also the technical and scientific progress bear new risks beside the therapeutic successes, further especially bigger hospitals require high efforts regarding organisation favouring errors in cases of deficiencies. Even the increasing juridification of the medicine that is expected to achieve a provisional highlight with the planned law of patients' rights leads to an important focus on the quality of medical care (see also [1]). The explicit legal regulation of patients' rights, which have never been out of question up to now, confirms the impression of patients who have to be protected from their doctors. This development favours a natural mistrust in the quality of the treatment and the desire of legal verification in cases of treatment failures. A totally perfect and error-free treatment, however, will never occur. Already this fact leads to the obligation to do everything possible to reduce the risk to an absolute minimum. The risks that might arise from a relation of treatment are manifold. Not only may the patient undergo risks that arise in particular from lacking or insufficient briefing, complications, or medical malpractice. Also the doctor has to fear legal consequences if he does not stick clearly to the increasing requirements that jurisdiction and legislation impose - not least by the planned law of patients' rights. In the following, the basic principles and particularities will be described that apply for the patients' briefing. Further the different types of medical malpractice will be explained in relation to the resulting procedural consequences. Finally some current problematic fields will be described with regard to other possible liabilities or responsibilities of physicians in hospitals or doctor's offices.

A patient as the victim of an illegal offence. Doctor’s legal obligations and limits of medical confidentiality

A patient as perpetrator of an illegal offence. Doctor's legal obligations and limits of medical confidentiality

Study of the knowledge of medical secrecy and the rationale for exempting a doctor from medical secrecy by the court - research article

Medical confidentiality against disclosure in the public interest: should such protective privilege ends when public peril begins?

From Hippocrates to facsimile. Protecting patient confidentiality is more difficult and more important than ever before

Keeping medical information safe and confidential: a qualitative study on perceptions of Israeli physicians

AIDS and professional secrecy in the United States

The legal situation of a physician when parents refuse treatment on behalf of a minor patient

Legal Protection in Medical Disputes for Doctors in Relation to The Principle of Lex Specialist

PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL MEDICAL INFORMATION IN UKRAINE: PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION

Medical negligence subject to criminal law

Protection of Information Constituting the Medical Secret in the Field of Application of «Artificial Intelligence» Technologies in Digital Medicine

ADMISSIBILITY OF PROVIDING INFORMATION CONSTITUTING MEDICAL CONFIDENTIALITY IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST

[Medical Student Secrecy, its Link to the Duty of Confidentiality and the Right to Access and Reuse Health Information]

Doctors, FIRs, and Arrest in Alleged Medical Negligence Cases in India: Demystifying the Legal Tenability

Errors and pitfalls: Briefing and accusation of medical malpractice - the second victim

Confidentiality and the rape victim: ethical intent versus political reality

[Medical error in theory and practice - a review of the most important issues]

[Strictly personal? Medical confidentiality in times of data protection]

Compelled Disclosure of Confidential Information in Patient Safety Research

Legal responsibility for infringements related to providing medical assistance and services