Abstract:The European Commission has proposed a new regulatory tool to govern of digital markets. The Digital Markets Act (DMA) intents to limit the market behavior of so-called gatekeepers to ensure contestable and fair digital markets. We review the provisions of the DMA both from a legal and from an economic perspective. Notwithstanding a number of benefits, we identify several issues with the current proposal. When looking at the core provisions of the proposal from an economic perspective, a number of of contention arise: many of the provisions seem to be quite narrow in scope and it seems difficult to extrapolate more general rules from them; the economic harm of some of the provisions is both uncertain and in principle debatable; the alleged (self-executing; non self-executing) distinction between different types of obligations cannot be verified; and, in addition, Art. 5–7 DMA seem to contain three distinct regulatory instruments; last but not least, while the DMA seeks to control existing gatekeepers, the "tipping" of markets and the rise of further gatekeepers is not guaranteed by the proposed regulation, this in turn leads to a larger critical analysis of the gatekeeper as the DMA's norm addressee. While the goals and nature of the DMA have gained in clarity throughout the legislative process, its scope remains somewhat obtuse. On the one hand it seems set on regulating gatekeepers as they exist today, on the other, it also aims to bring about systemic change in the digital single market. How it expects to achieve the latter is not entirely clear. On closer examination, the DMA also contains a complex enforcement regime that not only depends on the compliance of gatekeepers but may also forestall the envisioned speed and efficacy of the instrumment. In this light and by critically looking at the nature of ex ante and ex post measures in broader competition policy, we conclude that a reform of the competition policy regime would better suit the overalls aims of reining in big tech in future.

Navigating ne bis in idem: bpost, Nordzucker and the Digital Markets Act

A Unified Test for the European Ne Bis in Idem Principle: The Case Study of Digital Markets Regulation.

The Privacy/Antitrust Curse: Insights from GDPR Application in Competition Law Proceedings

Ne Bis In Idem: The Court of Justice of the European Union Weighs in on the Tax Debate

Which Mergers Should the European Commission Review under the Digital Markets Act?

Enforcing the Digital Markets Act: Institutional Choices, Compliance, and Antitrust

Rebates under EU Competition Law after the 2017 Intel Judgment: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Sector Inquiry into Cross-Border E-Commerce: Challenges and Practical Implications for European Union Completion Law

EU digital economy competition policy: From ex-post to ex-ante. The case of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Meta

An interpretative analysis of the European ne bis in idem principle through the lens of ECHR, CFR and CISA Provisions: Are three streams flowing in the same channel?

The EU’s Digital Markets Act: Regulatory Reform, Relapse or Reversal?

The Country of Origin Principle and the Applicable Law for Obligations Related to the Benefit of Information Society Services

Taming Tech Giants: The Neglected Interplay Between Competition Law and Data Protection (Privacy) Law

The Digital Markets Act: Regulating the Wild West

The Interrelation Between the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Schengen Agreement: The Ne Bis in Idem Example Through the CJEU Case Law

The Digital Markets Act: Fostering Innovation ‘Made in Europe’?

Resale price maintenance: by object infringements and per se infringements – mind the gap!

Huawei ./. ZTE, or, how the CJEU closed the Orange Book

Regulating Big Tech: From Competition Policy to Sector Regulation?

The Judgment of the EU Court of Justice in Intel and the Rule of Reason in Abuse of Dominance Cases

Rebates after the General Court’s 2022 Intel judgment