Intravenous versus perineural dexmedetomidine as adjuvant in adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty

Maha A Abo-Zeid,Sherine A Bakrey,Rania E Elbadrawy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.22579

IF: 5.167

2023-02-03

Korean Journal of Anesthesiology

Abstract:Background: Shivering following spinal anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty is challenging for anesthesiologist.Objective: To compare two different administrative routes of dexmedetomidine firstly, as a preventive of post-neuraxial shivering and secondly, as an adjunctive analgesic and sedative agent.Methods: This study enrolled 56 patients who randomly allocated into two equal groups. First, the Intravenous dexmedetomidine group (IV dex) who were given 0.5 µg /kg dexmedetomidine diluted in 20 mL saline by intravenous (IV) infusion while, 20 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine plus 1 mL saline was used for adductor canal block (ACB), and second, the adductor canal block dexmedetomidine group (ACB dex) who were given 20 mL saline by IV infusion while, 20 mL 0.25% levobupivacaine plus 1 mL of 0.5 µg /kg dexmedetomidine was used for ACB.Results: The incidence of shivering 1 h post spinal anesthesia was equal in both groups (50%) while, the shivering grade was significantly lower in the IV dex group 1h postoperatively. The onset of sensory block was significantly higher in the IV dex group (22.14 ± 2.52 min) than in the ACB dex group (12 ± 3.31 min). Postoperative analgesic duration (hours) shows a significant increase in the ACB dex group (12.28 ± 4.47) compared to the IV dex group (9.28 ± 1.9). Sedation scores were significantly higher in the ACB dex group in the preoperative, intraoperative, and immediate postoperative recordings.Conclusions: Perineural dexmedetomidine in ACB had a similar sedative and intraoperative anti-shivering effects compared to IV dexmedetomidine but, postoperatively it had lesser shivering control and superior analgesia after TKA under spinal anesthesia.