Testing the absorption coefficient of 3D printed perforated panels

Elizabeth G. Zusin,Kimberly A. Riegel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0018715

2023-03-01

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract:Sound absorption is common in most studios, but most residential spaces are not designed for good acoustics. While these rooms are non-ideal, they are sometimes used to record sounds and need to absorb unwanted frequencies. Perforated 3D printed panels have the potential to make inexpensive and modular home treatments. In order to determine if these panels would be effective, the absorptive properties need to be evaluated. There are several ways to test sound absorption, including the in situ subtraction method and the impedance tube transfer function method. Reference materials were used to test the effectiveness of both measurement methods. 3D printed perforated panels were then designed and the absorption was tested. Each surface was tested with the subtraction method, and many different setups for the equipment were tested to find the ideal setup for the most accurate absorption coefficient. The results show varying success. The 3D printed panels were then tested with the transfer function method. An impedance tube was made using PVC pipes and was used to test the transfer function method. This method showed varying results for the absorption coefficient tested, and results will be presented.

acoustics,audiology & speech-language pathology