Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Patient with an Acute Myocardial Infarction, Cardiogenic Shock and Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

A. Isath,S. Ohira,E. Hoch,D. Frenkel,J. Jacobson,G. Lanier,M. Kai,A. Gass,E. Levine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.801
IF: 13.569
2023-04-01
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Abstract:Introduction Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) provides hemodynamic support for cardiogenic shock (CS) as well as electrical instability. We present a case of cardiogenic shock requiring stepwise escalation of MCS for sequential biventricular failure from a myocardial infarction (MI) and subsequent malignant ventricular tachycardia (VT). Case Report A 63-year-old male was admitted with a late-presentation of anterior wall MI. Coronary angiography revealed proximal 100% left anterior descending artery (LAD) occlusion and chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery. He underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the LAD and placement of an Impella CP for a low cardiac index and hypotension. However, the patient remained in a low output state and an Impella 5.5 was placed with resultant hemodynamic stabilization. After multiple failed attempts at MCS weaning, the patient underwent placement of a HeartMate 3 LVAD. Perioperatively, he developed recurrent monomorphic VT that continued post-operatively and was refractory to anti-arrhythmic therapy, requiring innumerable cardioversions (Figure 1A, 1B). Incessant VT led to progressive right ventricular (RV) failure, and required Impella RP placement. (Figure 1C,1D).However, VT persisted with recurrent low flow from the LVAD. The patient was escalated to Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) to facilitate VT ablation. Seven VT morphologies arising from a scar around the Purkinje and fascicular system were targeted. Subsequently, he did not have any inducible VT and was able to be weaned off VA-ECMO successfully. He was discharged home on LVAD support with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator and has not had any recurrent VT. This case illustrates the stepwise escalation of MCS for biventricular failure and highlights the utility of MCS in patient with incessant VT and successful ablation for stabilization and a positive outcome.
surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?