The Next Frontier—Human Development and the Anthropocene: UNDP Human Development Report 2020
Franz Baumann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2021.1898908
2021-05-04
Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
Abstract:1. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier—Human Development and the Anthropocene, December 15, 2020, http://hdr.undp.org/en/2020-report; http://report.hdr.undp.org/.2. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, World Disasters Report 2020, https://media.ifrc.org/ifrc/world-disaster-report-2020.3. World Economic Forum, The Global Risks Report 2021 (16th ed., January 18, 2021), http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf.4. United Nations Security Council Resolution 678, November 29, 1990, http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/doc/678.5. F. Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (New York, NY: The Free Press, 1992).6. A. Sen, "Human Development and Mahbub ul Haq," Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier—Human Development and the Anthropocene, December 15, 2020, p. XI, http://hdr.undp.org/en/2020-report.7. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1987), 43.8. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 1990: Concept and Measurement of Human Development (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1990), 7.9. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 1991 (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1991), 1.10. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 2007-2008—Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a divided World (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).11. Astrid Matthey and Björn Bünger, Methodological Convention 3.0 for the Assessment of Environmental Costs, Cost Rates Version 02/2019 (February 2019), https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publikationen/2019-02-11_methodenkonvention-3-0_en_kostensaetze_korr.pdf.12. "Authorities should set supervisory expectations based on a prudent approach to climate-related and environmental risks" (206).13. "Just as integrating environmental science with economics revolutionized our understanding of environmental impacts, integrating machine learning will likely revolutionize real-time monitoring of global environmental systems. Together, these elements will empower decisionmakers to integrate the sustainability criterion into their everyday decisionmaking, guiding us towards true sustainable development" (220).14. The Global Carbon Atlas, http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/en/CO2-emissions.15. The countries are ranked according to the Human Development Index, and their ecological footprint ranking is shown in parentheses: 1, Norway (152), 2, Ireland (147) and Switzerland (142), 6, Germany (145), 7, Sweden (164), 8, Australia (165), 10, Denmark (167), 11, Finland (162), 13, the United Kingdom (136), 14, New Zealand (143), 16, Canada (170), 17, the United States (171). Table S7.5.1, p. 263.16. Worldometer, Coronavirus Cases, https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus.17. International Labour Organisation, ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work. Sixth edition Updated estimates and analysis, September 23, 2020, https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/briefingnote/wcms_755910.pdf.18. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), The Emissions Gap Report 2020, November 2020, https://www.unenvironment.org/emissions-gap-report-2020.19. SEI, IISD, ODI, Climate Analytics, CICERO, and UNEP, The Production Gap: The Discrepancy Between Countries' Planned Fossil Fuel Production and Global Production Levels Consistent With Limiting Warming to 1.5 °C or 2 °C (2019), http://productiongap.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Production-Gap-Report-2019.pdf </ulw.