Abstract:Instrumental variables (IV) regression is widely used to estimate causal treatment effects in settings where receipt of treatment is not fully random, but there exists an instrument that generates exogenous variation in treatment exposure. While IV can recover consistent treatment effect estimates, they are often noisy. Building upon earlier work in biostatistics (Joffe and Brensinger, 2003) and relating to an evolving literature in econometrics (including Abadie et al., 2019; Huntington-Klein, 2020; Borusyak and Hull, 2020), we study how to improve the efficiency of IV estimates by exploiting the predictable variation in the strength of the instrument. In the case where both the treatment and instrument are binary and the instrument is independent of baseline covariates, we study weighting each observation according to its estimated compliance (that is, its conditional probability of being affected by the instrument), which we motivate from a (constrained) solution of the first-stage prediction problem implicit to IV. The resulting estimator can leverage machine learning to estimate compliance as a function of baseline covariates. We derive the large-sample properties of a specific implementation of a weighted IV estimator in the potential outcomes and local average treatment effect (LATE) frameworks, and provide tools for inference that remain valid even when the weights are estimated nonparametrically. With both theoretical results and a simulation study, we demonstrate that compliance weighting meaningfully reduces the variance of IV estimates when first-stage heterogeneity is present, and that this improvement often outweighs any difference between the compliance-weighted and unweighted IV estimands. These results suggest that in a variety of applied settings, the precision of IV estimates can be substantially improved by incorporating compliance estimation.

An Omitted Variable Bias Framework for Sensitivity Analysis of Instrumental Variables

Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias

Bias Reduction in Instrumental Variable Estimation through First-Stage Shrinkage

Sensitivity Analysis of G-estimators to Invalid Instrumental Variables

Instrumental variable analysis in the presence of unmeasured confounding

Re-Evaluating Strengthened-IV Designs: Asymptotic Efficiency, Bias Formula, and the Validity and Power of Sensitivity Analyses

Bayesian variable selection in linear regression models with instrumental variables

Resistant Inference in Instrumental Variable Models

ivmodel: An R Package for Inference and Sensitivity Analysis of Instrumental Variables Models with One Endogenous Variable

BudgetIV: Optimal Partial Identification of Causal Effects with Mostly Invalid Instruments

Instrumental variables: A non-asymptotic viewpoint

Improving Inference from Simple Instruments through Compliance Estimation

Instrumental variables as bias amplifiers with general outcome and confounding

Sequential Underspecified Instrument Selection for Cause-Effect Estimation

Assumptions of IV Methods for Observational Epidemiology

The Instrumental Variable Model with Categorical Instrument, Treatment and Outcome: Characterization, Partial Identification, and Statistical Inference

The Effect of Omitted Variables on the Sign of Regression Coefficients

Bounded, efficient and multiply robust estimation of average treatment effects using instrumental variables

Confounder Balancing for Instrumental Variable Regression with Latent Variable

Instrumental Variables: An Econometrician's Perspective

Testability of Instrumental Variables in Additive Nonlinear, Non-Constant Effects Models