Abstract:Background: Complex bone defects are challenging to treat. Autografting is the gold standard for regenerating bone defects; however, its limitations include donor-site morbidity and increased surgical complexity. Advancements in 3D bioprinting (3DBP) offer a promising alternative for viable bone grafts. In this experiment, gels composed of varying levels of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and hydroxyapatite (HA) and gelatin concentrations are explored. The objective was to increase the hydroxyapatite content and find the upper limit before the printability was compromised and determine its effect on the mechanical properties and cell viability. Methods: Design of Experiments (DoE) was used to design 13 hydrogel bioinks of various GelMA/HA concentrations. These bioinks were assessed in terms of their pipettability and equilibrium modulus. An optimal bioink was designed using the DoE data to produce the greatest stiffness while still being pipettable. Three bioinks, one with the DoE-designed maximal stiffness, one with the experimentally defined maximal stiffness, and a literature-based control, were then printed using a 3D bioprinter and assessed for print fidelity. The resulting hydrogels were combined with human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) and evaluated for cell viability. Results: The DoE ANOVA analysis indicated that the augmented three-level factorial design model used was a good fit (p 0.05). There was, however, a significantly lower cell viability in the gel composed of 12.3% GelMA, 15.7% HA, and 2% gelatin compared to the other gels with a lower HA concentration (p < 0.05), showing that a higher HA content or print pressure may be cytotoxic within hydrogels. Conclusions: Extrusion-based 3DBP offers significant advantages for bone–tissue implants due to its high customizability. This study demonstrates that it is possible to create printable bone-like grafts from GelMA and HA with an increased HA content, favorable mechanical properties (145 kPa), and a greater than 80% cell viability.

A perspective on light-based bioprinting of DNA hydrogels for advanced bone regeneration: Implication for bone organoids

Projection-based 3D Bioprinting for Hydrogel Scaffold Manufacturing

DLP-based bioprinting of void-forming hydrogels for enhanced stem-cell-mediated bone regeneration

Hydrogels and Bioprinting in Bone Tissue Engineering: Creating Artificial Stem‐Cell Niches for in Vitro Models

Bioink Formulations for Bone Tissue Regeneration

3D Bioprinting Photo-Crosslinkable Hydrogels for Bone and Cartilage Repair

DNA hydrogels for bone regeneration

Stem Cell-Laden Hydrogel-Based 3D Bioprinting for Bone and Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Black Phosphorus Nanosheets-Enabled DNA Hydrogel Integrating 3D-Printed Scaffold for Promoting Vascularized Bone Regeneration

Engineering Large-Scale Self-Mineralizing Bone Organoids with Bone Matrix-Inspired Hydroxyapatite Hybrid Bioinks

Nanocomposite Hydrogels: 3d‐bioprinted Osteoblast‐Laden Nanocomposite Hydrogel Constructs with Induced Microenvironments Promote Cell Viability, Differentiation, and Osteogenesis Both in Vitro and in Vivo (adv. Sci. 3/2018)

3D-Bioprinted Osteoblast-Laden Nanocomposite Hydrogel Constructs with Induced Microenvironments Promote Cell Viability, Differentiation, and Osteogenesis Both in Vitro and in Vivo.

One-pot synthesis of hydroxyapatite hybrid bioinks for digital light processing 3D printing in bone regeneration

DNA-functionalized hyaluronic acid bioink in cartilage engineering: a perspective

Recent Strategies and Advances in Hydrogel-Based Delivery Platforms for Bone Regeneration

3D bioprinting of high-performance hydrogel with in-situ birth of stem cell spheroids

3D Bioprinting Techniques and Hydrogels for Osteochondral Integration Regeneration

3D Bioprinting of Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Hydrogels for 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Current progress and challenges

Developmental Biology-Inspired Strategies To Engineer 3D Bioprinted Bone Construct

Suitability of Gelatin Methacrylate and Hydroxyapatite Hydrogels for 3D-Bioprinted Bone Tissue