Abstract:Background: Rapidly evolving evidence in the treatment of metastatic HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can present challenges in aligning practice with the latest clinical data and guideline recommendations. In this ongoing quality improvement initiative, we identify and address real-world challenges healthcare professionals (HCPs) face in individualizing treatment plans, adverse event management, and patient-centered care for HER2+ MBC. Methods: From 9/2022 to 12/2022, 22 HCPs who treat patients with breast cancer (BC) along with 52 patients with HER2+ MBC from 2 large US community oncology clinics completed tethered surveys assessing practice patterns, challenges, and attitudes related to individualized and patient-centered care for HER2+MBC. Patient charts (n=100) were audited to assess current practice patterns and to track changes over time. Inclusion criteria included a confirmed HER2+ MBC diagnosis, prescription for two or more lines of HER2+ breast cancer treatment, and ≥ 1 visit in the one-year chart abstraction period. HCPs participated in audit-feedback sessions to assess site-specific challenges and gaps and developed action plans for improvement. Follow-up chart audits and HCP surveys will evaluate changes in practice patterns 6 months after the educational intervention. Results: The most frequently reported HCP challenges included coordination of care (41%) and individualizing treatment plans (32%). The most frequently reported patient challenges included feeling confident in treatment plan (30%) and being unable to meet work or home responsibilities (22%). In tethered surveys, there were discordant findings between patient and HCP perceptions related to goals for treatment, patient education, and patient-centered care. For example, 82% of HCPs reported often or always asking patients about treatment preferences, but only 8% of patients reported their doctor asked. While HCPs overwhelmingly thought surviving as long as possible was their patients' top goal (82%), patients reported their top goals for treatment were improving quality of life (57%) and controlling symptoms (41%). Additionally, while HCPs thought patients had the most difficulty managing nausea/vomiting (68%) and diarrhea (59%), patients reported they have the most difficulty managing fatigue (46%) and hair loss (44%). Baseline chart audits highlighted several areas for improvement in guideline-aligned care, including treatment selection, sequencing, and supportive care. Based on identified gaps, providers developed and implemented action plans, such as increasing use of patient navigators, referring patients for palliative care at time of diagnosis, improving multidisciplinary team-based approaches, and implementing tools and resources to stay up-to-date on clinical evidence and guidelines. Full findings from baseline surveys and chart audits will be presented, along with follow-up surveys and chart audits to measure impact. Conclusions: Through this QI initiative, we identified gaps in individualized, guideline-aligned, patient-centered care for patients with HER2+ MBC, and HCPs developed and are implementing action plans for improvement. The methods and findings from this initiative demonstrate key opportunities to improve outcomes for patients with HER2+ MBC in community oncology clinics. Citation Format: Reshma Mahtani, Erika Hamilton, Ilona Dewald, Chelsie Anderson, Jeffrey Carter, Cherilyn Heggen, Kelly McKinnon. Empowering Oncologists to Develop Individualized Management Strategies for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer: Findings from a Quality Improvement Initiative [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl) nr PO4-04-03.

Does the 4R oncology model improve clinicians’ effectiveness in patient-facing planning of complex cancer care?

The impact of 4R oncology model on patient self management and satisfaction in lung versus breast cancer.

The Impact of the 4R Oncology Model of Team-Based Care Delivery on Timing and Sequence of Guideline Recommended Interdependent Care in Breast and Lung Cancers

Intervention to Optimize Guideline-Recommended Interdependent Care Delivery in Breast and Lung Cancers with the 4R Oncology Model.

Care delivery and patient self-management for people with primary liver cancer receiving 4R care sequence plans.

Intervention to improve patient self-management and satisfaction in breast and lung cancers using the 4R Oncology model: Results by cancer, race and deprivation index.

Fostering a High-Functioning Team in Cancer Care Using the 4R Oncology Model: Assessment in a Large Health System and a Blueprint for Other Institutions

The Impact of the 4R Oncology Model on OncotypeDx Turnaround Time.

BPI20-017: Innovating Patient-Facing Care Pathways in Breast Cancer Using the 4R model, 4R = Right Information / Care / Patient / Time

Impact of a care delivery intervention for patients with socioeconomic disadvantages, in their preferred language of English or Spanish.

The impact of 4R Care Delivery Model on timing and sequence of bone density screening among breast cancer patients.

The impact of 4R Care Delivery Model on timing and sequence of bone density screening among patients with breast cancer.

Abstract 1301: Comparing VA and safety-net hospital patient-reported care metrics and provider recommendations to address social determinants of health and demographics

Cancer co-rounds: A novel inpatient multidisciplinary oncology rounding model.

Gaps and factors in patient awareness of biomarker test timing and purpose in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Baseline assessment for implementation of 4R Oncology model.

Awareness of biomarker test timing and purpose in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Interdisciplinary care rounds in the community: Changing the paradigm of supportive service involvement in cancer care.

Abstract PO4-04-03: Empowering Oncologists to Develop Individualized Management Strategies for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer: Findings from a Quality Improvement Initiative

The implementation of a self-care tool for patients that may reduce clinician burden.

Clinical pathways innovation: A lesson on the value of clinician based feedback and collaboration with Flatiron Health.

Implementation and Efficacy of a Large-Scale Radiation Oncology Case-Based Peer-Review Quality Program across a Multinational Cancer Network