Abstract:Abstract Background: Recent studies have demonstrated independent validation of the prognostic relevance of residual cancer burden (RCB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, a pooled subject-level analysis of multiple cohorts is needed to determine estimates of long-term prognosis for each class of RCB in each phenotypic subtype of breast cancer (BC) to better inform on patient outcomes. Also, a pooled subject-level analysis allows more detailed analyses of generalizability of the prognostic meaning of RCB assessments in a broader experience of practice settings. Method: Subject-level RCB results, with relevant clinical and pathologic stage, tumor subtype and grade, demographic, treatment and follow-up data from 11 institutes/trials are being collected for combined analysis. The association between the continuous RCB index and event-free survival (EFS), and distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) were assessed using mixed effect Cox models with the incorporation of random RCB coefficients to account for between-study heterogeneity. We will also allow for differences in baseline hazard across biological BC subtypes and, if needed, across studies as well. In addition to this stratified mixed effect model, a multivariate analysis adjusting for age, T-category, nodal status and grade was performed within each subtype. In addition, mixed effect Cox models will be employed to evaluate association between RCB index with EFS and DRFS within each HR/HER2 subtype. Kaplan Meier estimates of EFS and DRFS at 5 and 10 years were computed for each RCB class within subtype. Results: We analyzed subject-level data from 9 institutes/trials representing 4077 patients currently available from an anticipated final total of 4,800 patients (to be presented at the meeting). There were 950 EFS and 876 DRFS events during follow up (median 65 months, IQR: 70 months). RCB index (continuous) was independently prognostic within each subtype: HR+/HER2- (EFS HR (per unit increase in RCB index) =1.64, 95%CI 1.48-1.82; DRFS HR=1.68, 1.51-1.87), HR+/HER2+ (EFS HR=1.80, 1.57-2.05; DRFS HR=1.93, 1.67-2.24), HR-/HER2+ (EFS HR=2.15, 1.76-2.62; DRFS HR=2.10, 1.77-2.50), and HR-/HER2- (EFS HR=2.05, 1.89-2.22; DRFS HR=2.16, 1.90-2.46); and remained prognostic in multivariate models adjusting for age, grade, and clinical T and N stage at diagnosis. Table 1 contains the response rate and estimated EFS at 5 years and 10 years for each RCB class within each HR/HER2 phenotype (DRFS results were similar). Conclusions: Long-term prognosis after pCR was similarly excellent in all phenotypic subtypes. RCB index and classification was independently and strongly prognostic in all subtypes, and generalizable to multiple practice settings. Prognostic differences by RCB class occurred within 5 years in HR- BC, but extended to 10 years in HR+ BC. RCB-I had slightly worse EFS than pCR in HR- BC and HR+/HER2+ BC (after 5 years), but the same EFS as pCR in HR+/HER2- BC. Complete analysis of all subjects, including neoadjuvant treatments, will be presented at the meeting. PhenotypeOutcomepCRRCB-IRCB-IIRCB-IIIHR+/HER2-Frequency (%)11%10%52%27%(N=1467)5 yr EFS (95% CI)91% (86-96)93% (89-98)82% (79-85)70% (65-75)10 yr EFS (95% CI)84% (75-93)88% (82-95)71% (67-75)52% (46-58)HR+/HER2+Frequency (%)38%18%35%9%(N=762)5 yr EFS (95% CI)94% (91-97)93% (88-98)78% (73-84)49% (37-65)10 yr EFS (95% CI)91% (86-96)79% (70-90)65% (59-73)42% (29-60)HR-/HER2+Frequency (%)66%11%18%5%(N=550)5 yr EFS (95% CI)93% (90-96)88% (79-97)60% (50-71)45% (30-69)10 yr EFS (95% CI)90% (86-94)84% (74-95)56% (46-68)45% (30-69)HR-/HER2-Frequency (%)41%13%33%13%(N=1293)5 yr EFS (95% CI)92% (90-94)85% (79-91)68% (63-72)28% (21-36)10 yr EFS (95% CI)87% (82-91)80% (72-88)63% (58-68)24% (18-33) Citation Format: Christina Yau, Marieke van der Noordaa, Jane Wei, Marie Osdoit, Fabien Reyal, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Marick Lae, Miguel Martin, Maria del Monte, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium, Judy C Boughey, Rebekah Gould, Jelle Wesseling, Tessa Steenbruggen, Maartje van Seijen, Gabe Sonke, Stephen Edge, Stephen-John Sammut, Elena Provenzano, Jean Abraham, Peter Hall, Ashley Graham, Lorna Mackintosh, David Cameron, Alice Wang, Priyanka Sharma, Kimberly Cole, Lajos Pusztai, Mi-Ok Kim, Laura van ‘t Veer, Laura Esserman, W. Fraser Symmans. Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: A multi-center pooled analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-01.

Abstract P1-07-08: Prediction of breast cancer late recurrence according to Clinical Treatment Score post-five years (CTS5) and progesterone receptor in a wider patient population

EFFECT OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY ON ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-NEGATIVE, PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR-POSITIVE AND HER2 NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER PATIENTS

Clinical Treatment Score Post-5 Years (CTS5) and Late Recurrence Risk in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Abstract PO4-16-08: Prognostic factors for tumor recurrence after breast-conserving and radiotherapy treatment for early invasive breast cancer: ten years of results in a referral center in Mexico City

Abstract PO5-26-05: Machine learning-based risk prediction for late distant recurrence in young women with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative breast cancer

Clinical relevance of clinical treatment score post 5 years (CTS5) in HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer: An exploratory analysis from the HERA trial.

Is the CTS5 a helpful decision-making tool in the extended adjuvant therapy setting?

Abstract P2-03-18: Clinical use of Breast Cancer Index for prediction of late breast cancer recurrence and prediction of benefit in extended endocrine therapy: A single institution experience

Predicting the clinical outcomes and benefit from letrozole after 5 years of treatment with aromatase inhibitors for early breast cancer: analysis from CCTG MA.17R

Abstract 4975: Stretching the boundary of Oncotype DX testing

Abstract P2-08-04: Prediction of distant recurrence by EndoPredict in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy (ET+C) or endocrine therapy alone (ET)

Abstract GS5-01: Residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer: A multi-center pooled analysis

Abstract P5-03-15: Application of 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay to evaluate prognosis and benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers with early stage, estrogen receptor positive breast cancer

Time-Varying Prognostic Impact of Hormone Receptors for Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract P3-03-12: Risk of recurrence with adjuvant endocrine therapy in real world patients with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative early breast cancer: a US database analysis

Comparison of the Ability of Different Clinical Treatment Scores to Estimate Prognosis in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Patients: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study

De-escalation of Five-Year Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients with ER-low Positive Breast Cancer: Propensity-matched Analysis from a Prospectively Maintained Cohort

Predictive Value of Molecular Subtypes in Premenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-positive Early Breast Cancer: Results from the ABCSG Trial 5

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Patients With Hormone-Positive Breast Cancer With a Recurrence Score of 16-25: A Retrospective Analysis Using the National Cancer Database

Overestimation of Late Distant Recurrences in High-Risk Patients With ER-Positive Breast Cancer: Validity and Accuracy of the CTS5 Risk Score in the TEAM and IDEAL Trials

Impact of extended endocrine therapy for patients with risk factors for late recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer after 5 years of endocrine therapy