Abstract:Purpose – This study empirically investigates the effects of Official Development Assistance (ODA) on the economic activities of private actors in recipient countries. As a proxy for the economic activities of private actors, we utilize the job creation activities of foreign subsidiaries in recipient countries. The foreign subsidiaries provide a foundation for economic development by creating paying jobs. That is, if ODA has been successfully transferred to foreign subsidiaries, then these foreign subsidiaries should help economic growth and help create a boom in the local market by providing jobs. These jobs eventually lead to the achievement of the primary aims of foreign aid, including poverty reduction. Thus, this study empirically examines the relationship between ODA and the number of jobs created by foreign subsidiaries in recipient countries. Design/methodology – This is the first study to examine the effects of the ODA on the job creation of foreign subsidiaries because it has been hard to obtain internal information related to the employment status of foreign subsidiaries. Fortunately, we have a unique panel dataset provided by the Export- Import Bank of Korea (KEXIM) for 2006 to 2013. In terms of the empirical specification, we use the generalized least squares (GLS) method. The panel GLS estimator allows us to have an efficient estimation that overcomes the limitations of the panel data. It employs assumptions about the heteroscedasticity between the panels and makes an autocorrelation of the error term within each panel. Findings – We find that ODA influences job creation in foreign subsidiaries. In particular, we found that ODA creates more jobs in sales than in managerial or production positions. This study also shows that the effect of the ODA on the foreign subsidiaries’ job creation activities depend on the purpose of the ODA. By examining ODA effects on the foreign subsidiaries’ economic activities (e.g., job creation), this study fills a gap in the current literature. Originality/value – Existing studies that focus on the ODA effect have either a macroeconomic point or a microeconomic point of view. However, both approaches do not explain how well foreign aid has influenced private economic actors of recipient countries. In essence, previous researchers found it difficult to obtain the necessary data for internal employment status from foreign subsidiaries. However, thanks to the Korea Export-Import Bank, this study shows that ODA indeed influences the job creation activities of foreign subsidiaries even after controlling for other factors such as FDI, GDP growth rate, employment rate, household expenditure, mother firms’ share, etc. By doing so, we can examine how ODA influences the job creation of foreign subsidiaries, which might help economic development and reduce the amount of poverty in recipient countries.

Does Japanese ODA really contribute to economic growth for ASEAN countries?

Does FDI Source Matter for Growth? Evidence from Asian FDI Inflows in ASEAN Countries

The Nexus between Foreign Aid, Poverty Level and Economic Growth: Evidence from Nigeria

Empirical Study About ODA Effects on Job Creation

Foreign direct investment and economic growth: The role of financial development

Does agricultural official development assistance facilitate foreign direct investment in agriculture: Evidence from 63 developing countries

Analysis on the Impact of Economic Globalization on Human Development and Economic Growth in the ASEAN-4

Financial development, energy consumption, and economic growth in the ASEAN countries: evidence from the PVAR approach

The Impacts of Tax Revenue and Investment on the Economic Growth in Southeast Asian Countries

Asean Law And Economic Growth Asean

The impact of green finance and Covid-19 on economic development: capital formation and educational expenditure of ASEAN economies

Foreign Direct Investment, Female Education, Capital Formation, and Economic Growth in Japan and South Korea

Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in the Short Run and Long Run: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries

An Empirical Analysis of ODA and FDI’s Impact on Economic Growth in Developing Countries

Asymmetric effects of international trade and foreign direct investment on economic growth: Empirical evidence from Vietnam

Analysis of the Effect of Foreign Direct Investment, International Tourism Receipts, and Exchange Rate on GDP in ASEAN-4

Does foreign aid stimulate economic growth in developing countries? Further evidence in both aggregate and disaggregated samples

On Foreign Direct Investment from the ASEAN-8 Countries: A Panel Data Estimation

Does Foreign Debt Contribute to Economic Growth?

Aid, China, and Growth: Evidence from a New Global Development Finance Dataset

Global Crisis and Economic Fundamentals: Its Impact on Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN Countries