Abstract:Background The global outbreak of COVID-19 has become an international public health crisis. Specific antiviral treatments for COVID-19 are not yet available, and prevention is of particular importance to fight the virus. This study tends to explore and compare the roles of cognitive and affective factors in predicting preventive behavior adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Methods An online survey using a quota sampling method to collect responses from 3000 Chinese adults was conducted from March 2, 2020 to March 23, 2020. Questions included sociodemographic features, coronavirus knowledge, negative emotion, risk perception, and behavioral responses. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictors of behavioral responses toward COVID-19. Results On average, respondents had low levels of knowledge about COVID-19 (the overall correct response rate was 7.5%). Most respondents reported moderate to strong negative emotions towards the virus (3.47 out of 5). The average reported perceived chance of infection was 23.89%. For behavioral responses, respondents reported low frequencies of going out for activities (1.98 out of 4) and high frequencies of taking preventive measures (3.22 out of 4). Behavioral responses toward COVID-19 were found to be determined by cognitive and affective variables. Knowledge was negatively related to frequency of going out for activities (beta = - 0.11, p < .001). Negative emotion (beta = 0.34, p < .001), and risk perception (beta = 0.05, p = .007) were positively associated with going out for activities. The explanatory power of affective variables (Delta R-2 = 12.1%) was greater than cognitive variables (Delta R-2 = 1.0%). For preventive behaviors, knowledge was positively associated with preventive behaviors (beta = 0.22, p < .001). Negative emotion (beta = - 0.28, p < .001) and risk perception (beta = - 0.05, p = .002) were all negatively associated with preventive measures. Affective variables still showed stronger explanatory power (Delta R-2 = 8%) than cognitive variables (Delta R-2 = 4.4%) in predicting preventive behaviors. Conclusions After the rising period of the COVID-19 outbreak in mainland China, cognitive and affective variables still played important roles in predicting behavioral responses. Compared with cognitive factors, affective factors demonstrated stronger explanatory power in predicting behavioral responses toward COVID-19. The findings may have implications for enhancing individual compliance with guidelines of adopting preventive behaviors in response to COVID-19.

Application of protection motivation theory and cultural tightness-looseness for predicting individuals' compliance with the government's recommended preventive measures during regular prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic in China

Implicit Theories of Health, Consideration of Future Consequences, and Engagement in Health Protective Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China

How Vicarious Experiences Influence Non‐compliance with COVID‐19 Prevention Regulations

The Effects of Governmental and Individual Predictors on COVID-19 Protective Behaviors in China: A Path Analysis Model

COVID-19 Symptoms and Compliance: the Mediating Role of Fundamental Social Motives

Informational Support, Risk Perception, Anti-Pandemic Motivation and Behavior: a Longitudinal Study in China.

A Cross-Cultural Study of the Role of Efficacious Beliefs and Perceived Media Effects on Threat Perception in Predicting COVID-19 Compliance in China and the United States

Perceived Beliefs, Uncertainty, and Behavioral Responses During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China: Findings from a Convenience Sample.

Does risk perception motivate preventive behavior during a pandemic? A longitudinal study in the United States and China.

Understanding Compliance Intention of SNS Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Theory of Appraisal and Coping

What Drives People’s Protective Behaviors During the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in China

An Integrated Model Based on Theory of Planned Behavior, Norm Activation Model, and Political Opportunity Structure Theory

Pathways Improving Compliance with Preventive Behaviors during the Remission Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Recommended and Excessive Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Community-Based Online Survey in China

Obligation or Desire: Variation in Motivation for Compliance With COVID-19 Public Health Guidance

Effects of health-related dispositions on citizens' appraisals toward the COVID-19 pandemic and protective behavior

Impact of media trust and personal epidemic experience on epidemic prevention behaviors in the context of COVID-19: A cross-sectional study based on protection motivation theory

Government Intervention, Risk Perception, and the Adoption of Protective Action Recommendations: Evidence from the COVID-19 Prevention and Control Experience of China

The Adoption of Preventive Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China and Israel

The Effect of Cognition and Affect on Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Cross-Sectional Study in China

The roles of risk perception, negative emotions and perceived efficacy in the association between COVID-19 infection cues and preventive behaviors: a moderated mediation model