Using Quantitative Measurement of Knee Cartilage Volume by 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Osteoarthritis
B. Zhang,X. Zhi,R. Li,J. Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.561
IF: 7.507
2016-01-01
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Abstract:Purpose: There is a strong need for an accurate and quick noninvasive method that can give an early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and a valid estimate of the status of the cartilage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows a three-dimensional assessment of the entire knee joint and quantitative measurement of cartilage volume (CV). The objectives of our exploratory research were to: 1) compare the knee cartilage volume (CV) between different clinical symptoms and different X-ray Kellgren- Lawrence (K-L) grading for osteoarthritis, and 2) determine the clinical value of quantitative measurement by 3.0T MRI. Methods: Our original cohort consisted of 140 KOA patients (61male, 79 female) with a mean age of 49.2 years and 20 healthy (11 male, 9 female) with a mean age of 26.9 years. People were further classified into five groups (K-L grade 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) according to the OARSI X-ray Atlas. All participants underwent bilateral weight-bearing posterior-anterior semi-flexed knee radiographs and MRI of their knees with proton density (PD) and fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient recalled (FS-3D-SPGR) sequence, followed by a three-dimensional reconstruction analysis and measurement. We used a knee-specific WOMAC questionnaire to evaluate the severity of clinical symptoms and function. CV was determined by a semiautomatic software AW. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine whether there were differences of CV between different groups. We also evaluated the relevance of CV and WOMAC score using Spearman rank correlation test. Results: There were 18, 45, 43, 34 participants classified into K-L grade 1, 2, 3, 4 group, respectively, and 20 were judged as normal (K-L grade 0, control group). CV in different groups (K-L grade 0–4) were 27.163±3.256 cm3, 26.307±3.026 cm3, 21.254±4.589 cm3, 18.485±3.137 cm3 and 14.286±2.038 cm3, respectively. There were significant statistical differences between them (P <0.05) except K-L grade 0 and grade 1(P >0.05).The WOMAC scores in four groups (grade 1–4) were 8.2±7.3, 18.6±14.4, 31.9±18.7 and 45.4±16.5, respectively. There was a moderate negative correlation between CV and WOMAC score (P<0.05). Conclusions: With the increasing grading of OA, CV reduced gradually. A negative correlation was almost definite between quantitative measurements (CV) and WOMAC score in our research. This research provides initial evidence of quantitative measurements by 3.0T MRI as an accurate diagnostic method about OA severity. However, there was no significant CV variation in the early proceeding of OA, suggesting further research is necessary.