Abstract:Protein self-interactions measured via second osmotic virial coefficients (B22) and dynamic light scattering interaction parameter values (kD) are often used as metrics for assessing the favorability of protein candidates and different formulations during monoclonal antibody (MAb) product development. Model predictions of B22 or kD typically do not account for glycans, though glycosylation can potentially impact experimental MAb self-interactions. To the best of our knowledge, the impact of MAb glycosylation on the experimentally measured B22 and kD values has not yet been reported. B22 and kD values of two fully deglycosylated MAbs and their native (i.e., fully glycosylated) counterparts were measured by light scattering over a range of pH and ionic strength conditions. Significant differences between B22 and kD of the native and deglycosylated forms were observed at a range of low to high ionic strengths used to modulate the effect of electrostatic contributions. Differences were most pronounced at low ionic strength, indicating that electrostatic interactions are a contributing factor. Though B22 and kD values were statistically equivalent at high ionic strengths where electrostatics were fully screened, we observed protein-dependent qualitative differences, which indicate that steric interactions may also play a role in the observed B22 and kD differences. A domain-level coarse-grained molecular model accounting for charge differences was considered to potentially provide additional insight but was not fully predictive of the behavior across all of the solution conditions investigated. This highlights that both the level of modeling and lack of inclusion of glycans may limit existing models in making quantitatively accurate predictions of self-interactions.

Use of Debye–Hückel–Henry charge measurements in early antibody development elucidates effects of non-specific association

Antibody-ligand Interactions for Hydrophobic Charge-Induction Chromatography: a Surface Plasmon Resonance Study.

A Microcalorimetric Study of Molecular Interactions Between Immunoglobulin G and Hydrophobic Charge-Induction Ligand

Molecular Insight into Protein Binding Orientations and Interaction Modes on Hydrophobic Charge-Induction Resin.

Molecular Insights into the Binding Selectivity of a Synthetic Ligand DAAG to Fc Fragment of IgG

Molecular insight into the ligand-IgG interactions for 4-mercaptoethyl-pyridine based hydrophobic charge-induction chromatography.

Combining scattering experiments and colloid theory to characterize charge effects in concentrated antibody solutions

Impact of short range hydrophobic interactions and long range electrostatic forces on the aggregation kinetics of a monoclonal antibody and a dual-variable domain immunoglobulin at low and high concentrations

Simple Determination of Affinity Constants of Antibodies by Competitive Immunoassays

Antibody association in solution: cluster distributions and mechanisms

Characterization of Immunoglobulin Adsorption on Dextran-Grafted Hydrophobic Charge-Induction Resins: Cross-effects of Ligand Density and Ph/salt Concentration

Offline Coupling of Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography–Capillary Zone Electrophoresis for Monitoring Charge‐Based Heterogeneity of Recombinant Monoclonal Antibodies

Understanding the Stabilizing Effect of Histidine on mAb Aggregation: A Molecular Dynamics Study

Novel Structural Parameters of Ig–Ag Complexes Yield a Quantitative Description of Interaction Specificity and Binding Affinity

Insight into the avidity–affinity relationship of the bivalent, pH-dependent interaction between IgG and FcRn

Electrostatic complementarity at the interface drives transient protein-protein interactions

Unraveling the Microscopic Mechanism of Molecular Ion Interaction with Monoclonal Antibodies: Impact on Protein Aggregation

Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry Reveals Conformational Heterogeneity in Megadalton-Sized Monoclonal Antibody Aggregates

Electrostatically Mediated Attractive Self-Interactions and Reversible Self-Association of Fc-Fusion Proteins

Modeling the behavior of monoclonal antibodies on hydrophobic interaction chromatography resins

Impact of Glycosylation on Protein–Protein Self-Interactions of Monoclonal Antibodies