Spinoza, legal theory, and artificial intelligence: a conceptual analysis of law and technology

Moa De Lucia Dahlbeck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00458-w

2022-08-09

SN Social Sciences

Abstract:This paper sets out to show the relevance of Benedict Spinoza’s (1632–1677) views on law to the contemporary legal discourse on law and technology. I will do this by using some of the reactions toward the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in legal practices as illustrative examples of the continued relevance of the debate on law’s nature with which Spinoza was concerned in the fourth chapter of the Theological Political Treatise. I will argue that the problem of how to make laws efficient is being manifested in legal debates on how to regulate social and scientific practices that involve the use of certain—especially advanced—AI. As such, these debates are based on the idea that AI technology complicates the valid application of law in so far as it challenges the legal idea of the individual who corresponds with the unlimited legal subject. This complication is manifested, for instance, when we consider the rule of law criteria (predictability and transparency) for valid law-making and application in light of the fact that self-learning machines and autonomous AI hold an intentionality that lies beyond the scope of the lawmaker’s cognition. My discussion will lead to the suggestion that Spinoza’s legal theory may help us make sense of the problems perceived by legal discourses on AI and law as illustrations of a conceptual paradox embedded within the concept of law, rather than problems caused by the technological development of new forms of intentionalities.