Abstract:The helicase MCM and the ribonucleotide reductase RNR are the complexes that provide the substrates (ssDNA templates and dNTPs, respectively) for DNA replication. Here, we demonstrate that MCM interacts physically with RNR and some of its regulators, including the kinase Dun1. These physical interactions encompass small subpopulations of MCM and RNR, are independent of the major subcellular locations of these two complexes, augment in response to DNA damage and, in the case of the Rnr2 and Rnr4 subunits of RNR, depend on Dun1. Partial disruption of the MCM/RNR interactions impairs the release of Rad52 –but not RPA–from the DNA repair centers despite the lesions are repaired, a phenotype that is associated with hypermutagenesis but not with alterations in the levels of dNTPs. These results suggest that a specifically regulated pool of MCM and RNR complexes plays non-canonical roles in genetic stability preventing persistent Rad52 centers and hypermutagenesis. Cells have to accurately replicate their genomes to avoid loss of genetic information during cell divisions. This is achieved by coordinating the advance of the replication machinery with different mechanisms that prevent and/or repair errors during DNA synthesis. However, different DNA lesions accumulate during DNA replication that are repaired at DNA repair centers by error-free homologous recombination and error-prone translesion synthesis mechanisms. Here, we show that the replicative helicase and the ribonucleotide reductase complexes that provide the substrates (ssDNA templates and dNTPs, respectively) for DNA replication interact with each other in a DNA damage-regulated manner. Furthermore, we observe that these interactions facilitate the dynamics of a key recombination protein (Rad52) at the repair centers and prevent genetic instability by translesion synthesis through mechanisms that are not associated with the canonical functions of the replicative helicase and the ribonucleotide reductase complexes. We propose that these two essential complexes play non-replicative roles in preventing genetic instability in response to DNA damage by genetically regulated physical interactions.

The DNA Damage Sensor MRE11 Regulates Efficient Replication of the Autonomous Parvovirus Minute Virus of Mice

Parvovirus infection-induced DNA damage response

The NS1 protein of the parvovirus MVM Aids in the localization of the viral genome to cellular sites of DNA damage

SMC1-mediated intra-S-phase arrest facilitates bocavirus DNA replication

DNA damage sensor MRE11 recognizes cytosolic double-stranded DNA and induces type I interferon by regulating STING trafficking

MRE11A: a novel negative regulator of human DNA mismatch repair

Replication Protein A:current Progresses

For better or worse: crosstalk of parvovirus and host DNA damage response

MRNIP limits ssDNA gaps during replication stress

The Role of Mms22p in DNA Damage Response Incandida Albicans

Regulators in the DNA Damage Response.

RPA-coated single-stranded DNA as a platform for post-translational modifications in the DNA damage response

Single-stranded RNA Viruses Activate and Hijack Host Apical DNA Damage Response Kinases for Efficient Viral Replication

Acute Inactivation of the Replicative Helicase in Human Cells Triggers MCM8-9-dependent DNA Synthesis.

REV1 coordinates a multi-faceted tolerance response to DNA alkylation damage and prevents chromosome shattering in Drosophila melanogaster

MRN Complex is an Essential Effector of DNA Damage Repair

Physical interactions between specifically regulated subpopulations of the MCM and RNR complexes prevent genetic instability

REV1 Coordinates a Multi-Faceted Tolerance Response to DNA Alkylation Damage and Prevents Chromosome Shattering in

PARI Regulates Stalled Replication Fork Processing To Maintain Genome Stability upon Replication Stress in Mice

Rotavirus activates a noncanonical ATM‐Chk2 branch of DNA damage response during infection to positively regulate viroplasm dynamics

RecQ helicases and cellular responses to DNA damage.