An Essay of Investigation about Manseong Park Chibok’s Literary Collection: Centering on Comparison of First Edition and Republished Book

Jae-Hwan YOON,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31408/tdicr.2022.49.117
2022-12-31
Tae Dong Institute of classic research
Abstract:Manseong Park Chibok was a literary figure and scholar of the late Joseon period who, although not yet well known to the academic world, but now he leaves two types of literary collections. Comparing his two literary works, there is a considerable difference. This difference is due to the deletion and arrangement of the poems and sentences contained in the first edition book while bringing out the republished book. In a sentence, the difference between the first edition and the republished book can be divided into the cases where a sentence of a type not included in the first edition is included in the republished book, the sentence of the first edition is more than the republished book, and the sentence of the republished book is more than the first edition. This difference is also evident in the poetry. In the case of poem, the first edition is more than the republished book in the total number of works, but a poem not to be included in the first edition in the republished book has, so it is necessary to pay attention to comparison and review. In particular, in the case of series poem, a few poems have been deleted from some works in the first edition, so they should be carefully examined. The phenomenon found in Park Chibok's literary collection can be seen not only in his literary collection but also in most of the literary collections published in Korea in the pre-modern period. However, the difference between the series poem in the first edition and republished book shows that the person who leaves both the first edition and the republished book needs to be more cautious in his approach to the literary collection, and the literary capacity of the person who is responsible for correction or compilation in the publication of the republished book should be reviewed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?