Critical Factors and Economic Methods for Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Medical Device Industry
Jan Maci,Petra Marešová,Petra MareÅ¡ová
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S346928
2022-01-19
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Abstract:Jan Maci, Petra Marešová Department of Economics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic Correspondence: Petra Marešová Department of Economics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanskeho 62, Hradec Králové, 50003, Czech Republic Tel +420 737928745 Email Introduction: The regulatory area is one that restricts human behaviour and opportunities, but it also allows the prevention of loss of property, health, or even life in various fields. Regulations provide the market with public confidence, which is extremely important in the field of innovative medical devices. The aim of this article is to analyse critical factors and economic methods for regulatory impact assessment in the medical device industry, to focus on the finances, processes, or innovation activity of organisations operating in the medical device sector. Methods: The paper consists of a scoping review according to the PRISMA methodology of the available literature in Web of Science and Scopus database, whereby combing the keywords "regulation" AND "innovation" AND "medical device" AND "economic impact," we obtained a set of 156 results in the form of English-written articles. The output was then limited to the period between 2011 and 2020. Finally, 23 papers were used based on the exclusion and inclusion criteria. Results: The resulting challenges of the identified problems in particular are the amount of high-quality data available at an appropriate cost and the availability of a flexible notified body. There are also challenges specific to the situation, such as demands on the safety of medical devices for children. From a public expectations point of view, there is a continuing need to maintain the urgency of the balance between available innovation and safety. Discussion: As for the methods of economic assessment in general, or methods for assessing the economic impact of regulations in particular, cost-effectiveness analysis is the most commonly used method for research and development, while internal rate of return is frequently used for the producers, and budget impact analysis is typically used for healthcare service providers. A non-financial indicator that is often discussed is the time demands associated with meeting compliance requirements. The time-to-market indicator is also often mentioned. Economic and financial topics are not discussed in depth, as the reviewed articles simply mention the generally high costs attendant on complying with regulations and obtaining certificates. Keywords: medical device, regulatory assessment, critical factors, economic impact, innovation Regulation can be seen as a basic tool of government to pursue economic growth and, especially in the field of healthcare, society's well-being. The challenges of the contemporary world, such as the complexity of the system supported by foreign trade, new technologies, and other influences, make regulation an increasingly difficult discipline. 1 Regulation limits or, on the contrary, stimulates and pushes for some behaviour. This is one of the reasons why the topic of regulating economic activity is a very sensitive one, with overlaps into various scientific disciplines and human activities, such as political economy, law, and environmental sciences – including engineering, urban planning, health policy services, etc. Moreover, regulation is also a significant sociopolitical force. 2 In addition, regulation is such a complex issue that it meets the full extent of the term "regulatory science," defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "the science of developing new tools, standards, and approaches to assess the safety, efficacy, quality, and performance of all FDA-regulated products". 3 Due to the afore-mentioned complexity, the approach of regulatory impact analysis (RIA) has prevailed in the field of regulation for about 40 years. The concept of RIA, which is defined by International Telecommunication Union 4 as "a systematic, structured, evidence-based analysis of the prospective impacts of a proposed policy measure against possible alternatives," is promoted not only in the USA, where it was established, but also, owing to the OECD and the World Bank, it has been implemented across both developed and developing economies. While some regulations limit activity, at the same time they provide opportunities for pursuing new activities – in other words, opportunities for innovation. 5 Some innovations are ahead of regulations (ie technology-push innovation), while others only appear after regulations are introduced (ie technology-pull innovation). As stated by Faulkner, 2 technological innovation is comm -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services,health policy & services