Prospective study comparing drug coated balloons versus balloon angioplasty for management of critical limb ischemia patients with tibial occlusive disease

Nehad A. Fouad,Ahmed Abd AL Hamid Taha,Ahmed Maged Farghaly,Ahmed M. Al-Mahrouky,Ihab Nabil Hanna
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns3.8510
2022-06-06
International Journal of Health Sciences
Abstract:Background: For years interventionists have been searching for a technique of angioplasty to provide a reasonable patency without leaving something behind, and drug coated balloons came as the answer long waited with very promising preliminary results. This study aimed to compare between plain balloons and drug coated balloons as regard patency and limb salvage in treating tibial atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Methods: A prospective, randomized study. Patients with CTLI due to tibial atherosclerotic occlusive disease with or without concomitant inflow involvement are randomized into 2 groups, group A standard balloon angioplasty and group B drug coated balloons in a ratio of 2: 1. All patients were followed up for 12 months both clinically and radiologically for patency, limb salvage and wound healing. Results: No statistically significant differences were found regarding demographic data, co-morbidities, and risk factors between both groups. 93.3% of patients were diabetics. The one-year primary patency rates differ between the two approaches only at 12 months and was better for the DCB group (P-value 0.004). The one-year limb salvage rates didn’t differ between the two groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?