Abstract:Purpose While the current anti-globalisation wave is considered as a regional and cyclical relapse among Western countries, the new era of globalisation has shifted away from stagnant developed economies towards the rising prosperity of emerging Asia, where it is attracting substantial global inward foreign direct investment (FDI). Focussing on Vietnam, the country that is seen as Asia’s next economic tiger, the question of how important intellectual properties (IP) protection is in the international competition for FDI inflows is still unsettled, especially on the under-researched topic of trademarks. Design/methodology/approach This paper takes on the business history approach, which allows rich evidence from the dynamic and evolving natures of multinational enterprises (MNEs) to drive the research process, so that international business scholars can test models rigorously. The evidence provided in this paper is essentially qualitative and combines trademark registrations data, with trade and FDI statistics between 1986 and 2016, also draws on companies’ archives, industry reports and related newspaper articles. Findings This paper provides the chronology of intellectual property right (IPR) legal landscapes and the dynamic co-evolution of trademarks and FDI inflows in Vietnam. Three trademark protection strategies for MNEs and their patterns here are addressed. The paper also argues that trademarks bring new insights and IP protection strategy for pharmaceutical MNEs for the case of Vietnam is as important in trademarks as it is in patents. In emerging markets with strong incentives for FDI such as Vietnam, MNEs are not necessarily put off by weak IPR, but rather create alternative strategies for dealing with the lack of IP protection in these emerging market settings. Originality/value This study challenges the stream of thoughts that view trademarks as a “neglected intangible asset” among different IPRs, while in fact, trademarks advance MNEs’ knowledge by ensuring competitiveness and long-run survival in emerging markets. This paper is among the first few attempts to look at pharmaceutical industry through the lens of trademarks, moving away from the traditional patent-focussed approach. It extends the understanding of OLI paradigm and highlights that MNEs need to possess Oa and Op advantages not only at the beginning of internationalisation process but rather evolving through the time to cope with imitation risks in the host country.

Improving Intellectual Property Law in Relation to Three-Dimensional Trademarks and Sound Trademarks

Copyright Protection for Works Created by AI Technology under the EU Law and Vietnamese Law

IP protection by criminal law – A necessity for the development of science, technology, innovation and creativity in Vietnam

Recognition of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Patent Law of the European Union

PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOR SOUND TREND MARKS

FDI inflows and intellectual property rights for MNEs in emerging markets: an alternative approach through the lens of trademarks in Vietnam (1986-2016)

Legal conditions for the protection of three dimensional signs in trademark law

Protection of Non-Traditional Trademarks in China

Geographical Indications in Vietnam: Protection and Legal Issues

Trademark Law in the Digital Age: Challenges and Solutions for Online Brand Protection

Examination of the Legal Effect of Regulation of Trademarks in Nigeria

Intellectual Property Tools in Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Chinese Perspective

The Current State of Protection of European Trademark Rights in China

Analysis of Legal Protection of Non-traditional Trademarks from a Global PerspectiveTaking Scent Trademarks as an Example

A Framework for Improved Protection of Trademarks

The registration of non-traditional trademarks in China: a cautious approach

Legal bounds for non-conventional trademarks

Intellectual Property Law in the Digital Economy Era: New Challenges and Countermeasures

Refining the Right to Information in Vietnamese Consumer Law: Insights from Australia

Intellectual Property in the Age of 3D Printing

Patent Relating to Artificial Intelligence and Liability for Artificial Intelligence Application from the us Law Perspectives