Abstract A3: Possible Differential Effects Of Angiotensin Receptor-neprilysin Inhibitor And Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Against Hypertension And Cardiorenal Injury In A Mouse Model Of Cardiorenal Syndrome

Shunichiro Tsukamoto,Hiromichi Wakui,Tatsuki Uehara,Kengo Azushima,Kouichi Tamura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/hyp.79.suppl_1.a3
IF: 9.8968
2022-09-01
Hypertension
Abstract:Objective: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) are potential therapeutic candidates for the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Although evidence is accumulating on the therapeutic effects of ARNI for heart failure and hypertension, the effects of ARNI on kidney disease or CRS are controversial. Here, we assessed the hypothesis that ARNI has poor renal protective effect beyond its antihypertensive effect, in contrast to its promised cardioprotective effect, by using the ANS [Ang II (A) + nephrectomy (N) + saline (S)] mice, which is the CRS model. Method: C57BL/6 mice were divided into 5 groups (N = 5-6): Control (sham operation) group, ANS (ANS + vehicle treatment) group, Val M [ANS + moderate dose of valsartan treatment (30 mg/kg/day)] group, ARNI [ANS + sacubitril/valsartan treatment (60 mg/kg/day)] group, and Val H [ANS + high dose of valsartan treatment (60 mg/kg/day)] group. Sacrifice was performed after 4 weeks, and various analyses were conducted. Results: ARNI, Val M, and Val H groups attenuated the elevation of blood pressure (BP) in ANS mice (BP [mean ± standard error (SEM)] [mmHg]: ANS, 164 ± 3; ARNI, 133 ± 4; Val M, 143 ±1; Val H, 129 ± 2). Regardless of the strength of the antihypertensive effect, the ARNI group was most effective in preventing the decrease in cardiac contraction and cardiac fibrosis in ANS mice. However, the ARNI group was insufficient to suppress urinary albumin excretion (UAE) (UAE [mean ± SEM] [μg]; ANS, 5351 ± 2391; ARNI, 1169 ± 700) and renal fibrosis in ANS mice. Both valsartan groups suppressed UAE in ANS mice (UAE [mean ± SEM] [μg]; Val M, 243 ± 141; Val H, 305 ± 179), as well as renal fibrosis and glomerular swelling. In addition, the results of kidney RNA sequencing analysis showed that the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) signaling pathway was activated in the kidney of ARNI group compared with the Val M and Val H groups. Conclusions: The ARNI group showed better cardioprotective effects than valsartan treatment groups, but not sufficient kidney protection. These results suggested that the relationship between the antihypertensive effects and the organ protective effects of cardiorenal injury in CRS pathology may be different between angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and ARNI.
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?