Abstract:Background: Military-civilian partnerships (MCP) provide a bidirectional exchange of information and trauma best practices. In 2021, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center and the U.S. Navy signed a 3-year memorandum of understanding to embed active duty trauma providers into the Trauma Division to facilitate the training and sustainment of combat casualty care (CCC) skills. To date, there is little evidence to demonstrate the efficacy of military-civilian partnerships in maintaining combat casualty readiness in non-physician trauma providers. Methods: We evaluated the impact of combat casualty readiness for non-physician providers by mapping clinical experiences in an urban Level I trauma center against the Defense Health Agency's Joint Trauma Systems (JTS) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG). The JTS CPGs provide best practices for CCCand highlight the critical skills providers need to know before deploying to an austere environment. Patient acuity data and specific JTS CPG skills performed by a non-physician providers were collected in their respective specialties for each patient seen between January 2023 to January 2024. Analyses were performed using descriptive statistics via Redcap. Results: A sample of 6 Navy personnel in different specialties: 1 Physician Assistant, 3 Registered Nurses (emergency medicine, perioperative, critical care), and 2 corpsmen (scrub tech and search & rescue/prehospital medic) completed 1299 records on patients treated. In all, 685 (52.7%) were trauma patients and 614 (47.3%) were non-trauma patients. Categories of injuries seen, listed from the most frequent to the least, were as follows: Other (764), Falls (250), Motor Vehicle Crashes (164), Gunshot Wound (126), Stab-related injuries (41). Category 1 skills, defined as "essential to know," were performed in 921 (36.1%) of the patients treated. In Category 2, skills described as "important to know" were performed in 889 (34.8%) of the patients treated. Category 3 skills, identified as "less urgent" as they are rare among trauma patients, were performed in 486 (19.0%) of the patients treated, and 252 (9.8%) required none of the JTS CPG skills. These categories were further broken down based on the frequency of the skills performed. Analysis revealed strengths and identified opportunities to direct clinical experience for underperforming skills. Conclusion: Military-civilian partnerships support CCC readiness. The data presented and the continuation of mapping personnel's clinical experience to military CPGs can gauge readiness in non-physician trauma providers. Notably, several skills in each category were identified as opportunities to modify the clinical exposure of the military provider. These findings indicate that modifications in clinical assignments could enhance active duty combat casualty readiness in these critical skills.

Tactical Combat Casualty Care in the Light of Current Information

Addressing Differences in Knowledge and Experience in Trauma Care Capabilities Among an International Team of Military Medical Care Providers in a Deployed Setting

Military-Civilian Partnership to Improve Combat Casualty Care Readiness Among Non-physician Providers

Evaluation of Contingency Telemedical Support to Improve Casualty Care at a Simulated Military Intermediate Resuscitation Facility: The EM-ANGEL Study

Case-control analysis of prehospital death and prolonged field care survival during recent US military combat operations

Development of virtual reality training system for combat musculoskeletal trauma care

The Clinical Decision Support System for Trauma Emergency Care: Development, Modification and Clinical Use (Preprint)

Tactical EMS: an emerging opportunity in graduate medical education

Revolutionizing Combat Casualty Care: The Power of Digital Twins in Optimizing Casualty Care Through Passive Data Collection

Casualty evacuation in arctic and extreme cold environments: A paradigm shift for traumatic hypothermia management in tactical combat casualty care

Trauma-informed Care Training in Trauma and Emergency Medicine: A Review of the Existing Curricula

Operational Critical Care. Intensive Care and Trauma

An Inventory of the Combat Medics' Aid Bag

Tactical Combat Casualty Care Maritime Scenario: Shipboard Missile Strike

Expectant Casualty Care Training Needs for Future Conflicts

Limitations of Triage in Military Mass Casualty Response: A Case Series

Transforming US Army trauma care: an evidence-based review of the trauma literature

Advise and Assist: A Basic Medical Skills Course for Partner Forces

Preparing for the Future of Combat Casualty Care: Opportunities to Refine the Military Health System's Alignment with the National Defense Strategy

Triage in Complex, Coordinated Terrorist Attacks

The Perfect Med Bag is One that Doesn't Fall Off a Cliff: A Combat Mass Casualty Case