Abstract:Because technologies are frequently used for sexual gratification it seems plausible that artificial communication partners, such as voice assistants, could be used to fulfill sexual needs. While the idea of sexualized interaction with voice assistants has been portrayed in movies (e.g., “Her”), there is a lack of empirical research on the effect of the ontological class (human versus artificial) on the voice’s potential to evoke interest in a sexualized interaction and its perception in terms of sexual attractiveness. The Sexual Interaction Illusion Model (SIIM), which emphasizes influences on sensations evoked by artificial interaction partners, furthermore suggests that there may be contextual influences, especially sexual arousal, that may be crucial for the question of engaging in a sexualized interaction with an artificial entity. To empirically investigate whether the ontological class of the speaker (computer-mediated human in comparison to voice assistants) and the level of sexual arousal affects the heterosexual males’ interest in hearing more flirtatious messages and the perception of the communication partner’s sexual attractiveness, an online experiment with between subject design was conducted. Two hundred and fifty seven respondents were confronted with at least four, and voluntarily six messages from either a computer-mediated human or a flirtatious voice assistant, in interaction with being previously primed sexually or neutrally. The results demonstrated that the effect of sexual arousal was not prevailing on the interest in further messages and the attractiveness perception of the interaction partners, while the ontological class did so. Here, the voice assistant evoked more interest in further messages and the technology itself, while the computer mediated human was perceived to be more sexually attractive and flirtatious, and evoked more social presence. The communication partners social presence was shown to be the predictor with most explanatory power for the interaction partners perceived sexual attractiveness, regardless of whether it was human or artificial. The results underline differences between artificial and human interaction partners, but also underline that especially social presence and the feeling that the user is addressed (in terms of flirtatiousness) is crucial in digitalized intimacy regardless of the ontological class.

Factors of attraction in human-machine communication

Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda

The Interplay between Human and Machine Agency

Robotic Moment: the Influence Mechanism of Frequency of Socializing on Willingness to Interact with AI Robots

Disentangling Two Fundamental Paradigms in Human-Machine Communication Research: Media Equation and Media Evocation

Interaction Process Between Humans and ChatGPT in the Context of Interpersonal Communication

Affective multimodal human-computer interaction

Interfacing the human/machine

Human-machine social systems

Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence

Using Virtual Humans to Understand Real Ones

Theory of Robot Communication: II. Befriending a Robot Over Time

Human Factor Studies on Gestural Interaction: Past, Present, and Future

Flirting With or Through Media: How the Communication Partners’ Ontological Class and Sexual Priming Affect Heterosexual Males’ Interest in Flirtatious Messages and Their Perception of the Source

We and It: An Interdisciplinary Review of the Experimental Evidence on Human-Machine Interaction

“Artificial humans”: Psychology and neuroscience perspectives on embodiment and nonverbal communication

Minding the source: toward an integrative theory of human–machine communication

Communicative capital: a key resource for human-machine shared agency and collaborative capacity

Human/AI relationships: challenges, downsides, and impacts on human/human relationships

Mediatization and Human-Machine Communication: Trajectories, Discussions, Perspectives