Abstract:Objectives Optimising postoperative pain following knee replacement is important for patients, healthcare professionals and healthcare funders. Adductor canal blocks (ACB) are widely used but there is uncertainty about their efficacy when combined with local infiltration analgesia (LIA) compared with either LIA or ACB alone. Design A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled. The primary outcome was pain over the first 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included morphine use, range of movement, distance walked, length of hospital stay, health economic outcomes and reported adverse events. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase, EB Health - KSR Evidence, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, International HTA database, ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO) were searched up to June 2023. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials involving patients undergoing primary total knee replacement comparing LIA combined with ACB to either LIA or ACB alone. Data extraction and synthesis All eligible studies were data extracted independently by two reviewers. Studies were pooled for each outcome at each timepoint in a random effects meta-analysis. Results We identified 13 completed studies including 1154 participants. 12 studies compared LIA vs combination and 5 compared ACB vs combination. We identified that participants receiving the combination had lower pain scores at rest at 24 hours compared with LIA alone (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.64) or ACB alone (SMD 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83). Pain on movement at 24 hours was also lower for patients with combination vs LIA alone (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.73) or ACB alone (SMD 0.81, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.26). We also identified that patients on combination used less morphine than on LIA alone (MD 1.06, 95% CI –0.09 to 2.20) or ACB alone (MD 5.94, 95% CI –2.41 to 14.29). The same was seen with range of motion at 24 hours with combination having a larger improvement than LIA alone (MD –5.19, 95% CI –5.55 to –4.83) or ACB alone (MD –3.80, 95% CI –4.37 to –3.23). These findings were consistent across all time points; however, there were no studies deemed to be at a low risk of bias. Conclusions Further well-designed and conducted randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm if a combination of LIA and ACB is superior to either option alone for patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023436895.

Efficacy of Local Infiltration of Analgesics via Intra-articular Epidural Catheter vs Adductor Canal Block in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery.

Efficacy of Single-Shot Adductor Canal Block Combined with Posterior Capsular Infiltration on Postoperative Pain and Functional Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.

Impact of intra-articular local anesthesia infiltration versus femoral nerve block for postoperative pain management in total knee arthroplasty

Adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia with morphine and betamethasone show superior analgesic effect than local infiltration analgesia alone for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block Combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block for Post-Operative Analgesia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

Effect of Adductor Canal Block Combined with Local Infiltration Analgesia on Postoperative Pain of Knee Arthroscopy Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block Combined with Additional Analgesic Methods for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

Pain control post total knee replacement in patients given local infiltrative analgesia combined with adductor canal block compared to either modality alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adductor Canal Nerve Block versus Intra-articular Anesthetic in Knee Arthroscopy: A Single-Blinded Prospective Randomized Trial

Adductor canal blockade versus continuous epidural analgesia after total knee joint replacement: A retrospective cohort study

A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia vs. intrathecal morphine after total knee replacement: A randomised controlled trial

Which is the best analgesia treatment for total knee arthroplasty: Adductor canal block, periarticular infiltration, or liposomal bupivacaine? A network meta-analysis

Effect of local infiltration analgesia, peripheral nerve blocks, general and spinal anesthesia on early functional recovery and pain control in total knee arthroplasty

Analgesic effects of local infiltration analgesia in multimodal analgesia for unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty

An Analysis of the Use of Anesthetic Blocks versus Local Anesthesia Infiltration in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery

Comparison of local infiltration and epidural analgesia for postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Local infusion analgesia using intra-articular double lumen catheter after total knee arthroplasty: a double blinded randomized control study

Comparison Between Local Infiltration Analgesia with Combined Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block for Pain Management after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Adductor Canal Block Combined with IPACK Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Adductor Canal Block Combined with IPACK Block for Postoperative Analgesia and Function Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.