The JPC Periodic Table
George C. Schatz,Anne B. McCoy,Joan-Emma Shea,Catherine J. Murphy,Gregory Scholes,Victor Batista,Kankan Bhattacharyya,Juan Bisquert,Daniel Crawford,Tanja Cuk,Robert Dickson,Howard Fairbrother,Maria Forsyth,John Fourkas,Franz Geiger,Andrew Gewirth,Theodore Goodson,Gillian R. Goward,Hua Guo,Gregory V. Hartland,Pavel Jungwirth,Stephan Link,Gang-yu Liu,Zhi-Pan Liu,Benedetta Mennucci,Timothy Minton,Amy S. Mullin,Oleg Prezhdo,William F. Schneider,Benjamin Schwartz,Neil Snider,Gemnia Solomon,Eric Weitz,Xueming Yang,Arun Yethiraj,Francisco Zaera,Martin Zanni,Jin Zhang,Haizheng Zhong,Timothy Zwier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01057
2019-01-01
Abstract:I this Virtual Issue, we celebrate the International Year of the Periodic Table by presenting one paper in JPC that is concerned with each of the 118 elements. Actually only 116 elements have appeared in JPC papers, with elements 109 and 110, meitnerium and darmstadtium, somehow missing as far as we can tell. However, all the rest are there, and the JPC editors, including editors of JPC A, B, C, and Letters, have all contributed to the list given below, with links to the original articles provided. In choosing these papers, we tried to focus mostly on papers that are well cited and that refer to the element of interest rather than to complex chemistry where the element is one of many involved. However, in many cases the importance of an element is defined by its role in important molecules or materials, so some of the papers are concerned with the physical chemistry of the molecules or materials. Of course, many of the chemical elements have multifaceted personalities when it comes to their physical chemistry, so we apologize that we could only list one paper for each element when, in fact, there were many excellent choices. Near the bottom of the periodic table (Z > 100), the number of papers concerned with some elements is quite limited, so the few people brave enough to study these elements receive a lot of publicity in this document. There are numerous interesting stories that are woven through these papers. We could easily write a story about each element, but to keep this discussion focused, let us only mention a few general issues. It is notable to think about the dates on these papers and when the elements were discovered. The elements with Z > 92 were all discovered since 1940, so many of the papers on our list refer to physical property measurements that were done shortly after their discovery. And elements withZ > 99 are sufficiently unstable that most of the papers refer to computational studies or empirical models, sometimes done in advance of the discovery of the element (and often before the element had a name, so only the atomic number appears in the paper, or perhaps the name “Eka-X” where X is the corresponding element from the row above on the periodic table). Theory plays an important role with many of the lighter (but still heavy) elements, particularly those that are radioactive (Z > 83) and are in low abundance. There have also been several experimental papers concerned with the radioactive properties of these elements.Wewere not able to include papers going back to the beginning of JPC in 1896, but one can find papers by Marie and Pierre Curie and Henri Becquerel that refer to some of the very first measurements on Po, Ra, and other radioactive elements. Among the elements with Z < 100, one theme refers to elements that are gases, including the rare gases (but some of our papers for those refer to liquid or solid forms) and non rare gas molecules that form gaseous diatomics (N2, O2, Cl2, Br2, I2). The papers in this case refer to spectroscopic measurements or, in some cases, gas-phase chemical reactions of either neutrals or ions. There are many elements where ions in solution are extremely important (our papers include K, Rb, Cs, Mg, Pr, Np, Cm, Bk, Cf, Es, and Fm). Many of these ions are important in biophysics, and we also note that our papers on O and S are concerned with biophysics. Several of the papers are concerned with elemental liquids or solids either as covalent materials (C, Si, Ge, S, Sb, Tl) or as metals (alkalis, noble metals, Fe, Ni, Nb, Pd). Of course, water and solvation are prominently featured (H) and occasionally elements that formmolecular liquids (Be).Many of themetals in the table form colloids (noble metals), and then there are the important oxides, sulfides, nitrides, arsenides, etc. that form nanostructures of various types (Ti, Sc, Zr, Cd, Sn, La, Ce, Ir. Pb, Bi, Th, Pa, U, Am), including 2D nanomaterials (F, B, P, As). Battery materials show up in many places (Li, P, Se), and we also find examples of elements that play a crucial role in coordination chemistry (Ru, Rh), catalysis (N, Fe, Sr, Mo, Re, Pt), electronic materials (In,Te, Hf, Ta, W), and intermetallics (Sb, Po). Thermodynamic properties and earth abundance are important in some of papers we cite. Ca, Ba, Tc, At, Fr, Pu, and the lanthanides have their expected roles as emitters, contrast agents, and electronic materials. Finally, we note that the paper we list for Hg involves the use of mercury drop to describe autonomous motion in the presence of a K2Cr2O7 crystal. This discussion amply notes the incredible richness associated with the periodic table that one sees in a list of 116 papers. We are delighted that JPC has been able to play (thanks for Cathy Murphy’s suggestion) an important role in the dissemination of these scientific discoveries.