Abstract:When the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) was recently in the process of revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA), Neurology ® ran a series of debates over certain controversial issues being deliberated. Omitted was a debate over the fundamental concept underlying brain death. In his introductory article, Bernat offered reasons for this omission: “It is not directly relevant to practicing neurologists who largely accept brain death, do not question its conceptual basis, ....” In this article I argue the opposite: the fundamental concept of death is highly relevant to the clinical criteria and tests used to diagnose it. Moreover, most neurologists in fact disagree with the conceptual basis articulated by Bernat. Basically, there are 3 competing concepts of death: (1) biological : cessation of the integrative unity of the organism as a whole (endorsed by Bernat and the 1981 President's Commission), (2) psychological: cessation of the person, equated with a self-conscious mind (endorsed by half of neurologists), and (3) the vital work concept proposed by the 2008 President's Council on Bioethics. The first actually corresponds to a circulatory, not a neurologic, criterion. The second corresponds to a “higher brain” criterion. The third corresponds loosely to the UK's “brainstem death” criterion. In terms of the biological concept, current diagnostic guidelines entail a high rate of false-positive declarations of death, whereas in terms of the psychological concept, the same guidelines entail a high rate of false-negative declarations. Brainstem reflexes have nothing to do with any death concept (their role is putatively to guarantee irreversibility). By shining a spotlight on the deficiencies of the UDDA through attempting to revise it, the ULC may have unwittingly opened a Pandora's box of fresh scrutiny of the concept of death underlying the neurologic criterion—particularly on the part of state legislatures with irreconcilably opposed worldviews.

The Death of Cryonics: Factors Related to Its Poor Uptake

Cryonics: Science or Religion

Cryonics: Traps and transformations.

Cryonics for all?

Mourning the frozen: considering the relational implications of cryonics

Cryopreservation of Animals and Cryonics: Current Technical Progress, Difficulties and Possible Research Directions

Technical examination of cryonics

Sixty seconds on . . . cryopreservation

Ethical Problems and Countermeasures of Human Body Cryopreservation for the Purpose of Resuscitation

Cryonics, euthanasia, and the doctrine of double effect

A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy

Ethical aspects of cryobiology: responsible applications in biomedicine and in clinical practice

Cryogenic Media in Biomedical Applications: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

Egg Cryopreservation for Social Reasons—A Literature Review

Advanced Cryopreservation Engineering Strategies: the Critical Step to Utilize Stem Cell Products

Dying to understand how historical trends and influential intermediaries impact the future of sustainable deathcare

"Death as the One Great Certainty": ethical implications of children with irreversible cardiorespiratory failure and dependence on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Cryostorage failures: a medicolegal review

The emergence of temporality in attitudes towards cryo-fertility: a case study comparing German and Israeli social egg freezing users

Necessity is the Mother of Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: Can We Live Up to the Promise?

The Fundamental Concept of Death—Controversies and Clinical Relevance