Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid May Be Assessed Earlier to Allow Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Unresponsive Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Guilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado,Cláudia Alves Couto,Debora Raquel Benedita Terrabuio,Eduardo Luiz Rachid Cançado,Cristiane Alves Villela-Nogueira,Maria Lucia Gomes Ferraz,Michelle Harriz Braga,Mateus Jorge Nardelli,Luciana Costa Faria,Nathalia Mota de Faria Gomes,Elze Maria Gomes Oliveira,Vivian Rotman,Maria Beatriz Oliveira,Simone Muniz Carvalho Fernandes da Cunha,Marlone Cunha-Silva,Liliana Sampaio Costa Mendes,Claudia Alexandra Pontes Ivantes,Liana Codes,Valéria Ferreira de Almeida e Borges,Fabio Heleno de Lima Pace,Mario Guimarães Pessoa,Laura Vilar Guedes,Izabelle Venturini Signorelli,Gabriela Perdomo Coral,Cynthia Levy,Paulo Lisboa Bittencourt,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07654-x
2022-08-22
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Abstract:BackgroundResponse to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has been traditionally assessed 1 to 2 years after treatment initiation. With the development of new drugs, some patients may benefit from an earlier introduction of second-line therapies.AimsThis study aims to identify whether well-validated response criteria could correctly identify individuals likely to benefit from add-on second-line therapy at 6 months.MethodsAnalysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort which included only patients with clear-cut PBC.Results206 patients with PBC (96.6% women; mean age 54 ± 12 years) were included. Kappa concordance was substantial for Toronto (0.67), Rotterdam (0.65), Paris 1 (0.63) and 2 (0.63) criteria at 6 and 12 months, whereas Barcelona (0.47) and POISE trial (0.59) criteria exhibited moderate agreement. Non-response rates to UDCA was not statistically different when assessed either at 6 or 12 months using Toronto, Rotterdam or Paris 2 criteria. Those differences were even smaller or absent in those subjects with advanced PBC. Mean baseline alkaline phosphatase was 2.73 ± 1.95 times the upper limit of normal (× ULN) among responders versus 5.05 ± 3.08 × ULN in non-responders (p < 0.001).ConclusionsAfter 6 months of treatment with UDCA, the absence of response by different criteria could properly identify patients who could benefit from early addition of second-line therapies, especially in patients with advanced disease or high baseline liver enzymes levels.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?