Usability Assessment of Delivery Applications for Visually Impaired People: A Case from Saudi Arabia

Hend S Al-Khalifa,Bayan Albatati
DOI: https://doi.org/10.54455/mcn.21.06
2022-10-16
Nafath
Abstract:Technology has become an essential part of our lives, and many of our daily tasks have become entirely dependent on it. For example, routine chores such as shopping for household necessities, booking travel tickets, going to places using all different kinds of transportations etc., are quickly done through mobile phones. And because of how it is easy to use mobile phones, we may forget that others, such as the visually impaired, may face many difficulties when using them. In this research two of the most widely used delivery applications in Saudi Arabia, namely, Hungerstation and Mrsool were studied and evaluated in order to assess their usability for people with visual impairments. Evaluation results show that both applications have usability problems. Nonetheless, the results of the standard ISO usability metrics (Effectiveness, Efficiency and satisfaction) showed that Hungerstation is more usable than Mrsool.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?